The Economist has a series of articles right now on the impact of data on business, and pointing out how new data driven companies are rapidly not simply transforming sectors but eliminating competitors. Their argument is that these internet giants are going to require regulators to look at new ways to avoid monopolies and anti-competitive practices. It describes data as a more valuable resource than oil in the modern world.When we look at firms like Amazon, Lyft, Google and what they have done to retail, taxi firms and advertising it is hard to understate just what a dramatic impact these firms have had. Yet fifteen years ago the idea that Amazon would be one of the world’s largest data center service providers would have seemed ridiculous, Amazon are a retailer, what has that to do with data centers? Google are a search engine with some adverts, what have they to do with mobile phones? Apple make some shiny laptops and computers, but mobile phones and speech recognition? Not their thing.To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
In the world of ever-more complex systems, there is nothing more fragile than an attempt to make nothing fail. A system that assumes that everything must work is a system designed to fail. The reality of the world is that things will fail, and those cannot bring down the whole business. As British Airways has amply demonstrated, a fragile system where everything fails is not good for business.Many years ago I wrote some posts on the challenges of five nines in a distributed world, and as systems become ever more about delivering functionality through a combination of services, micro-services and networks so the importance of designing for failure becomes ever more important, and the foundation of designing for failure is assuming it will happen.To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
In the world of ever-more complex systems, there is nothing more fragile than an attempt to make nothing fail. A system that assumes that everything must work is a system designed to fail. The reality of the world is that things will fail, and those cannot bring down the whole business. As British Airways has amply demonstrated, a fragile system where everything fails is not good for business.Many years ago I wrote some posts on the challenges of five nines in a distributed world, and as systems become ever more about delivering functionality through a combination of services, micro-services and networks so the importance of designing for failure becomes ever more important, and the foundation of designing for failure is assuming it will happen.To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
Steve Jones