If you’ve spent time supporting AI infrastructure, whether that’s a GPU training cluster, a fleet of inference nodes, or a multi-tenant model serving platform, you’ve probably noticed something: the network telemetry tools that served you well in a traditional data center feel slightly out of place here. Not useless. Just not quite designed for this.
The traffic patterns are different. The failure modes are different. The things you need to catch early are different. And if you’re running NetFlow or sFlow collection – which you should be – understanding where that data genuinely helps versus where you’re looking at the wrong instrument is the difference between a useful monitoring stack and a false sense of coverage.
Why AI Traffic Is Different
Most of the networking intuition you’ve built over a career was forged on north-south traffic – clients reaching services, users reaching the internet, workloads reaching storage. Even in modern microservices environments with heavy east-west traffic, flows are relatively short-lived, heterogeneous in size, and largely TCP-based with normal congestion dynamics.
AI training breaks most of those assumptions simultaneously.
A distributed training job across a GPU cluster is synchronous in a way that most networked workloads are not. Every GPU in Continue reading