The more debate I hear over protocols and product positioning in the networking market today, the more I realize that networking has a very big problem with myopia when it comes to building products. Sometimes that’s good. But when you can’t even see the trees for the bark, let alone the forest, then it’s time to reassess what’s going on.
Sit down in a bar in Silicon Valley and you’ll hear all kinds of debates about which protocols you should be using in your startup’s project. OpenFlow has its favorite backers. Others say things like Stateless Transport Tunneling (STT) are the way to go. Still others have backed a new favorite draft protocol that’s being fast-tracked at the IETF meetings. The debates go on and on. It ends up looking a lot like this famous video.
But what does this have to do with the product? In the end, do the users really care which transport protocol you used? Is the forward table population mechanism of critical importance to them? Or are they more concerned with how the system works? How easy it is to install? How effective it is at letting them do their jobs?
The Continue reading
Quantum physics is a funny thing. It seeks to solve all the problems in the physical world by breaking everything down into the most basic unit possible. That works for a lot of the observable universe. But when it comes to light, quantum physics has issues. Thanks to experiments and observations, most scientists understand that light isn’t just a wave and it’s not just a collection of particles either. It’s both. This concept is fundamental to understanding how light behaves. But can it also explain how data behaves?
We tend to think about data as a series of discrete data units being pushed along a path. While these units might be frames, packets, or datagrams depending on the layer of the OSI model that you are operating at, the result is still the same. A single unit is evaluated for transmission. A brilliant post from Greg Ferro (@EtherealMind) sums up the forwarding thusly:
It’s simple when you think Continue reading
Copper is heavy. I’m not talking about it’s atomic weight of 63 or the fact that bundles of it can sag ceiling joists. I’m talking about the fact that copper has inertia. It’s difficult to install and even more difficult to replace. Significant expense is incurred when people want to run new lines through a building. I never really understood how expensive a proposition that was until I went to work for a company that run copper lines.
According to a presentation that we saw at Tech Field Day Extra at Cisco Live Milan from Peter Jones at Cisco, Category 5e and 6 UTP cabling still has a significant install base in today’s organizations. That makes sense when you consider that 5e and 6 are the minimum for gigabit Ethernet. Once we hit the 1k mark with speeds, desktop bandwidth never really increased. Ten gigabit UTP Ethernet is never going to take off outside the data center. The current limitations of 10Gig over Cat 6 makes it impossible to use in a desktop connectivity situation. With a practical limit of around 50 meters, you practically have to be on top of the IDF closet Continue reading
As whitebox switching starts coming to the forefront of the next buying cycle for enterprises, decision makers are naturally wondering about the advantages of buying cheaper hardware. Is a whitebox switch going to provide more value for me than buying something from an established vendor? Where are the real savings? Is whitebox really for me? One of the answers to this puzzle comes not from the savings in whitebox purchases, but the capability inherent in rapid deployment.
When users are looking at the acquisition cost advantages of buying whitebox switches, they typically don’t see what they would like to see. Ridiculously cheap hardware isn’t the norm. Instead, you see a switch that can be bought for a decent discount. That does take into account that most vendors will give substantial one-time discounts to customers to entice them into more lucrative options like advanced support or professional services.
The purchasing advantage of whitebox doesn’t just come from reduced costs. It comes from additional unit purchases. Purchasing budgets don’t typically spell out that you are allowed to buy ten switches and three firewalls. They more often state that you are allowed to spend a certain dollar amount on devices Continue reading
During the recent Virtualization Field Day 4, I was located at a vendor building and jumped on their guest wireless network. There are a few things that I need to get accomplished before the magic happens at a Tech Field Day event, so I’m always on the guest network quickly. It’s only after I take care of a few website related items that I settle down into a routine of catching up on email and other items. That’s when I discovered that this particular location blocked access to IMAP on their guest network. My mail client stalled out when trying to fetch messages and clear my outbox. I could log into Gmail just fine and send and receive while I was on-site. But my workflow depends on my mail client. That made me think about guest WiFi and usability.
Guest WiFi is a huge deal for visitors to an office. We live in a society where ever-present connectivity is necessary. Email notifications, social media updates, and the capability to look up necessary information instantly have pervaded our lives. For those of us fortunate enough to still have an unlimited cellular data plan, our connectivity craving Continue reading
On my way to Virtualization Field Day 4, I ran into a bit of a snafu at the airport that made me think about policy and application. When I put my carry-on luggage through the X-ray, the officer took it to the back and gave it a thorough screening. During that process, I was informed that my double-edged safety razor would not be able to make the trip (or the blade at least). I was vexed, as this razor had flown with me for at least a whole year with nary a peep from security. When I related as much to the officer, the response was “I’m sorry no one caught it before.”
This incident made me start thinking about polices in networking and security and how often they are arbitrarily enforced. We see it every day. The IT staff comes up with a new plan to reduce mailbox sizes or reduce congestion by enforcing quality of service (QoS). Everyone is all for the plan during the discussion stages. When the time comes to implement the idea, the exceptions start happening. Upper management won’t have mailbox limitations. The accounting department is Continue reading
I’m running out of drive space. Not just on my laptop SSD or my desktop HDD. But everywhere. The amount of data that I’m storing now is climbing at an alarming rate. What’s worse is that I often forget I have some of it until I go spelunking back through my drive to figure out what’s taking up all that room. And it’s a problem that the industry is facing too.
Data is accumulating. You can’t deny that. Two factors have lead to this. The first is that we now log more data from things than ever before. In this recent post from Chris Evans (@ChrisMEvans), he mentions that Virgin Atlantic 787s are generating 500GB of data per flight. I’m sure that includes telemetry, aircraft performance, and other debugging information that someone at some point deemed crucial. In another recent article from Jacques Mattheij (@JMattheij), he mentions that app developers left the debug logging turned on, generating enormous data files as the system was in operation.
Years ago we didn’t have the space to store that much data. We had to be very specific about what needed to be Continue reading
Welcome to a new year finally divisible by five! This is a year devoid of extra February days, Olympics, or anything else. It’s a chance for us to take a look at technology and make things better and easier for users and IT staff. It’s also probably going to be called the year of VDI, NFV, and SDN. Again.
Rather than writing a wrap up post for the end of 2014 like so many other sites, I like to look at what I said I was going to do 365 days ago and see if I followed through on them. It’s a way to keep myself honest and also to see how the year transformed around me and my goals.
Thankfully, my goals for 2014 were modest. I wanted to get more involved with the people in the IT industry. And I did that in a big way. I went to a ton of conferences and events through the year. Cisco Live, VMworld, and HP Discover Barcelona were all on my list this year, as well as all of the Tech Field Day events I took part in as an organizer. It was a grand Continue reading
The IT world is cyclical for sure. I’ve seen trends and topics repeating themselves over and over again in my relatively short time here. I find it interesting that we keep solving similar problems over and over again. I also find it fascinating that this particular issue leads to the reason why blogs are so important.
Questions abound in IT. It’s the nature of the industry. However, it’s not just new questions that we create when technology leaps past us. We keep asking the same questions over and over again. This is the field of study that created the FAQ, remember?
In recent memory, I find the same questions being asked over and over again:
You’ve probably asked those very same questions. Perhaps you found the answers you were looking for. Perhaps you’re still trying to figure it out. The problem is that those questions are still being asked. The industry should have evolved to the point where the simple questions have been answered with simple answers. Complex questions, or those questions that need more in-depth Continue reading
An article came out this week that really made me sigh. The title was “Six Aging Protocols That Could Cripple The Internet“. I dove right in, expecting to see how things like Finger were old and needed to be disabled and removed. Imagine my surprise when I saw things like BGP4 and SMTP on the list. I really tried not to smack my own forehead as I flipped through the slideshow of how the foundation of the Internet is old and is at risk of meltdown.
If It Ain’t Broke
Engineers love the old adage “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!”. We spend our careers planning and implementing. We also spend a lot of time not touching things afterwards in order to prevent it from collapsing in a big heap. Once something is put in place, it tends to stay that way until something necessitates a change.
BGP is a perfect example. The basics of BGP remain largely the same from when it was first implemented years ago. BGP4 has been in use since 1994 even though RFC 4271 didn’t officially formalize it until 2006. It remains a critical part of how the Continue reading
Gallons of virtual ink have been committed to virtual paper in the last few days with regards to Cisco’s lawsuit against Arista Networks. Some of it is speculating on the posturing by both companies. Other writers talk about the old market vs. the new market. Still others look at SDN as a driver.
I didn’t just want to talk about the lawsuit. Given that Arista has marketed EOS as a “better IOS than IOS” for a while now, I figured Cisco finally decided to bite back. They are fiercely protective of IOS and they have to be because of the way the trademark laws in the US work. If you don’t go after people that infringe you lose your standing to do so and invite others to do it as well. Is Cisco’s timing suspect? One does have to wonder. Is this about knocking out a competitor? It’s tough to say. But one thing is sure to me. Cisco has effectively killed the command line interface (CLI).
“Industry Standards”
EOS is certainly IOS-like. While it does introduce some unique features (see the NFD3 video here), the command syntax is very much IOS. That is purposeful. There are two Continue reading
Whitebox switching has moved past the realm of original device manufacturers and has been taken up by traditional networking vendors. Andre Kindness (@AndreKindness) of Forrester recently posted that he fields several calls from his customers every day asking about a particular vendor’s approach to whitebox switching. But what do these vendor offerings look like? And can we predict how a given vendor will address the whitebox market?
Chocolate In My Peanut Butter
Dell was one of the first traditional networking vendors to announce a whitebox switch offering that decoupled the operating system from the switching hardware. Dell offered packages from Cumulus Linux and Big Switch Networks alongside their PowerConnect lineup. This makes sense when you consider that the operating system on the switch has never been the strong suit of Dell. The PowerConnect OS is not very popular with network engineers, being very dissimilar from more popular CLIs such as Cisco IOS and its look-alikes. Their attempts to capitalize on the popularity of Force Ten OS (FTOS) and adapt it or use on PowerConnect switches has been difficult at best, due to the divide been hardware architecture of the two platforms.
What Dell is very good at is Continue reading
HP has quietly been making waves recently with their networking strategies. They recently showed off their technology around software defined networking (SDN) applications at Interop New York. Here’s a video:
It would seem that HP has been doing a lot of hard work on the back end with SDN. So why haven’t we heard about it?
Trumpet and Bugle
HP Networking hasn’t been in the news as much as Cisco and VMware as of late. When you consider that both of those companies are pushing agendas related to redefining the paradigm of networking around policy and virtualization their trumpeting of those agendas makes total sense. But even members of the League of Non-Aligned Vendors like Brocade are talking a lot about their SDN strategy with the Vyatta Controller and OpenStack integrations. Vendors have layers and layers of plans for the “new” networking. But HP has actually been doing it! Why haven’t we known until now?
HP has been content to play the role of the bugler to the trumpeters of the bigger organizations. Rather than talking over and over again about what they are planning on doing, HP waits until they’ve actually done it to talk Continue reading
Software Defined Networking has changed the way that organizations think about their network infrastructure. Companies are looking at increasing automation of mundane tasks, orchestration of policy, and even using white box switches with the help of new unbound operating systems. A new class of technologies that is coming to market hopes to reduce complexity and cost for the Achilles Heel of many enterprises: the Wide Area Network (WAN).
Do You WANt To Build A Snowman?
The WAN has always been a sore spot for enterprise networks. It’s necessary to connect your organization to the world. If you have remote sites or branch locations, it is critical for daily operations. If you have an e-commerce footprint your WAN connection needs to be able to handle the generated traffic. But good WAN connectivity costs money. Lots of money.
WAN protocols are constantly being refined to come up with the fastest possible transmission and the highest possible uptime. Frame Relay, Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) and Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) are a succession of technologies that have shaped enterprise WAN connectivity for over a decade. They have their strengths and weaknesses. But it is difficult to build an enterprise WAN Continue reading
Last week I went to go talk to a group of vocational students about networking. While I was there, I needed to send a couple of emails. I prefer to write emails from my laptop, so I pulled it out of my bag between talks and did the first thing that came to mind: I asked for the wireless SSID and password. Afterwards, I started thinking about how far we’ve come with connectivity.
I can still remember working with a wireless card back in 2001 trying to get the drivers to play nice with Windows 2000. Now, wireless cards are the rule and wired ports are the exception. My primary laptop needs a dongle to have a wired port. My new Mac Mini is happily churning along halfway across the room connected to my network as a server over wireless. It would appear that the user edge quietly became wireless and no tears were shed for the wire.
It’s also funny that a lot of the big security features like 802.1x and port security became less and less of an issue once open ports started disappearing in common areas. 802.1x for wired connections is barely even talked about Continue reading
The President recently released a video and statement urging the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to support net neutrality and ensure that there will be no “pay for play” access to websites or punishment for sites that compete against a provider’s interests. I wholeheartedly support the idea of net neutrality. However, I do like to stand on my Devil’s Advocate soapbox every once in a while. Today, I want to show you why a truly neutral Internet may not be in our best interests.
Lawful Neutral
If the FCC mandates a law that the Internet must remain neutral, it will mean that all traffic must be treated equally. That’s good, right? It means that a provider can’t slow my Netflix stream or make their own webmail service load faster than Google or Yahoo. It also means that the provider can’t legally prioritize packets either.
Think about that for a moment. We, as network and voice engineers, have spent many an hour configuring our networks to be as unfair as possible. Low-latency queues for voice traffic. Weighted fair queues for video and critical applications. Scavenger traffic classes and VLANs for file sharers and other undesirable bulk noise. These plans take weeks to Continue reading
I spent a bit of my career on the phone doing support for a national computer vendor. In addition to the difficulties of walking people through opening the case and diagnosing motherboard issues, I found myself needing to overcome language barriers. While I only have a hint of an accent (or so I’ve been told), spelling out acronyms was a challenge. That’s where the phonetic alphabet comes into play
By now, almost everyone uses the NATO phonetic alphabet. It’s the most recognized in the world. The US joint Army/Navy version varies a bit but does have a lot of similarities. However, when I first started out using the NATO version quite a few callers didn’t know what Lima was or giggled when I said Tango.
I decided that some people have much more familiarity with first names. This was borne out when I kept using Mary for “M” instead of Mike. People immediately knew it. Same for Victor, Peter, and so on. So I cobbled together my own Name Phonetic Alphabet.
A – Adam
B – Barbara
C – Charlie
D – David
E – Edward
F – Frank
G – George
H – Harold
I Continue reading
Last week, Twitter confirmed that they will start injecting tweets from users you don’t follow into your timeline. The collective cry from their user base ranged from outrage to a solid “meh”. It seems that Twitter has stumbled onto the magic formula that Facebook has perfected: create a feature the users don’t care about and force it onto them. Why?
Twitter Doesn’t Care About Power Users
Twitter has an interesting mix of users. They reported earlier this year that 44% of their user base has never tweeted. That’s a lot of accounts that were created for the purpose of reserving a name or following people in read-only mode. That must concern Twitter. Because people that don’t tweet can’t be measure for things like advertising. They won’t push the message of a sponsored tweet. They won’t add their voice to the din. But what about those users that tweet regularly?
Power users are those that tweet frequently without a large follower base. Essentially, everyone that isn’t a celebrity with a million followers or a non-tweeting account. You know, the real users on Twitter. The people that make typos in their tweets and actually check to see who follows them. The ones Continue reading
It seems as though the entire tech world is splitting up. HP announced they are splitting the Personal Systems Group into HP, Inc and the rest of the Enterprise group in HP Enterprise. Symantec is forming Veritas into a separate company as it focuses on security and leaves the backup and storage pieces to the new group. IBM completed the sale of their x86 server business to Lenovo. There are calls for EMC and Cisco to split as well. It’s like the entire tech world is breaking up right before the prom.
Acquisition Fever
The Great Tech Reaving is a logical conclusion to the acquisition rush that has been going on throughout the industry for the past few years. Companies have been amassing smaller companies like trading cards. Some of the acquisitions have been strategic. Buying a company that focuses on a line of work similar to the one you are working on makes a lot of sense. For instance, EMC buying XtremIO to help bolster flash storage.
Other acquisitions look a bit strange. Cisco buying Flip Video. Yahoo buying Tumblr. There’s always talk around these left field mergers. Is the CEO Continue reading
Network programmability is a very hot topic. Developers are looking to the future when REST APIs and Python replaces the traditional command line interface (CLI). The ability to write programs to interface with the network and build on functionality is spurring people to integrate networking with DevOps. But what happens if the foundation of the programmable network, the API, isn’t the rock we all hope it will be?
Shiny API People
APIs enable the world we live in today. Whether you’re writing for POSIX or JSON or even the Microsoft Windows API, you’re interacting with software to accomplish a goal. The ability to use these standard interfaces makes software predictable and repeatable. Think of an API as interchangeable parts for software. By giving developers a way to extract information or interact the same way every time, we can write applications that just work.
APIs are hard work though. Writing and documenting those functions takes time and effort. The API guidelines from Microsoft and Apple can be hundreds or even thousands of pages long depending on which parts you are looking at. They can cover exciting features like media services or mundane options like buttons and toolbars. But each of these Continue reading