Archive

Category Archives for "Thomas Habets blog"

My mechanical keyboard

You spend all your waking time at a keyboard. This blog post is about keyboards, and can be summarized as: Buy quality, cry once.

I spend a lot of time typing on a keyboard, yet I have never looked into what keyboard would be best for me. There are natural keyboards and kinesis keyboards that people speak well of, but I spend a lot of time typing on laptops and don’t want a completely different setup for laptop and desktop.

I had the same concern before switching to Dvorak back when I was a consultant (thus often using other peoples managed machines), but happily switched after verifying that even on a locked down Windows machine as a non-admin user I could select Dvorak. Also there are adapters from Dvorak to Qwerty that I could use in extremely locked down environments such as the CCIE lab (they required a doctors note though, long story).

So it would have to be a keyboard that looks like a normal one. Preferably with Dvorak on the keycaps. It seems that mechanical keyboards are all the rage, so I thought I’d give that a go.

I ended up buying a 88 key Cherry MX brown-based Continue reading

Secure browser-to-proxy communication – again

I've previously blogged about a secure connection between browser and proxy. Unfortunately that doesn't work on Android yet, since except if you use Google for Work (an enterprise offering) you can't set Proxy Auto-Config.

This post shows you how to get that working for Android. Also it skips the stunnel hop since it doesn't add value and only makes Squid not know your real address. I'm here also using username and password to authenticate to the proxy instead of client certificates, to make it easier to set up.

Hopefully this feature will be added to Chrome for Android soon (bug here) but until then you'll have to use the Android app Drony.

First, why you would want to do this

  • You have machines behind NAT, and a proxy that can see the inside while still accessible form the outside

    This way you can port forward one port from the NAT box to the proxy, and not have to use different ports everywhere. I'll call this proxy corp-proxy.example.com.

  • You have servers that don't implement their own authentication, and you want the proxy to do it for you

    If you set up so that the only way to Continue reading

Colour calibration in Linux

This is just a quick note on how to create .icc colour profiles in Linux. You need a colour calibrator (piece of hardware) for this to be useful to you.
#!/bin/sh
NAME=$1
COLOR=$2
DESC="Some random machine"
QUALITY=h   # or l for low, m for medium
set -e

dispcal -m -H -q $QUALITY -y l -F -t $COLOR -g 2.2 $NAME
targen -v -d 3 -G -e 4 -s 5 -g 17 -f 64 $NAME
dispread -v -H -N -y l -F -k $NAME.cal $NAME
colprof -v -D $DESC -q m -a G -Z p -n c $NAME
dispwin -I $NAME.icc

Another way to protect your SSH keys

Let's say you don't have a TPM chip, or you hate them, or for some other reason don't want to use it to protect your SSH keys. There's still hope! Here's a way to make it possible to use a key without having access to it. Meaning if you get hacked the key can't be stolen.

No TPM, but key can't be stolen anyway? Surely this is an elaborate ruse? Well yes, it is. My idea is that you essentially bounce off of a Raspberry Pi.

But doing that straightforward is too easy. I've instead made an SSH proxy, and will show you how to automatically bounce off of it. You could do the same by setting up a second SSH server (or the same one), and hack around with PAM and a restricted shell. But this solution can be run as any user, with just the binary and the set of keyfiles. Very simple.

The goal here is to log in to shell.foo.com from your workstation via a Raspberry Pi. The workstation SSH client presents its SSH client key to the SSH Proxy on the Raspberry Pi, and if allowed will connect on and present the SSH Continue reading

Don’t forget to restart all your OpenSSL binaries

The wonder of UNIX is that you can delete running binaries and loaded shared libraries. The drawback is that you get no warning that you're still actually running old versions. E.g. old heartbleed-vulnerable OpenSSL.

Server binaries are often not forgotten by upgrade scripts, but client binaries almost certainly are. Did you restart your irssi? PostgreSQL client? OpenVPN client?

Find processes running with deleted OpenSSL libraries:

$ sudo lsof | grep DEL.*libssl
apache   17179      root  DEL       REG        8,1               24756 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0

Or if you're extra paranoid, and want to make sure everything is using the right OpenSSL version:

!/bin/sh
set -e
LIB="/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0"
if [ ! "$1" = "" ]; then
   LIB="$1"
fi
INODE="$(ls -i "$LIB" | awk '{print $1}')"
lsof | grep libssl.so | grep -v "$INODE"

A few points:
  • Run this as root in case lsof otherwise wouldn't be able to get at the data (e.g. if you run grsec)
  • This assumes all libssl is on one filesystem, since it only checks inode number
  • The easiest solution is of course to restart the whole machine, but there's really no reason to if you don't want to

How TPM-protected SSH keys work

In my last blog post I described how to set up SSH with TPM-protected keys. This time I'll try to explain how it works.

SRK

The SRK is a public key pair that is the main secret inside the TPM chip. It is always generated by the chip, and the private key cannot be read or migrated.

In order to use the SRK key with any operation, the SRK password must be supplied. The SRK password is just an access password. It's not related to the key itself. The SRK password is usually set to the Well Known Secret (20 null characters), or sometimes the empty string, or something silly like "12345678".

There is not much point in having a good SRK password, since you probably have to store it on disk somewhere anyway, to allow TPM operations by daemons.

If you want a password then you probably want to set that per key, not chip-wide like the SRK password is.

Key generation

The stpm-keygen binary asks the TPM to generate a key, and the TPM hands back the public portion of the key, and a "blob" that has no meaning to anyone except the TPM. The blob is encrypted Continue reading

How TPM-protected SSH keys work

In my last blog post I described how to set up SSH with TPM-protected keys. This time I'll try to explain how it works.

SRK

The SRK is a public key pair that is the main secret inside the TPM chip. It is always generated by the chip, and the private key cannot be read or migrated.

In order to use the SRK key with any operation, the SRK password must be supplied. The SRK password is just an access password. It's not related to the key itself. The SRK password is usually set to the Well Known Secret (20 null characters), or sometimes the empty string, or something silly like "12345678".

There is not much point in having a good SRK password, since you probably have to store it on disk somewhere anyway, to allow TPM operations by daemons.

If you want a password then you probably want to set that per key, not chip-wide like the SRK password is.

Key generation

The stpm-keygen binary asks the TPM to generate a key, and the TPM hands back the public portion of the key, and a "blob" that has no meaning to anyone except the TPM. The blob is encrypted Continue reading

TPM chip protecting SSH keys – properly

Not long after getting my TPM chip to protect SSH keys in a recent blog post, it started to become obvious that OpenCryptoKi was not the best solution. It's large, complicated, and, frankly, insecure. I dug in to see if I could fix it, but there was too much I wanted to fix, and too many features I didn't need.

So I wrote my own. It's smaller, simpler, and more secure. This post is about this new solution.

Why not Opencryptoki?

  • It generates at least some keys in software. As I've explained earlier, I want to generate the keys in hardware.
  • It generates migratable keys. This is hardcoded, and some people obviously want migratable keys (for backup purposes). So a fix would have to involve supporting both.
  • Opencryptoki has no way to send such parameters from the command line key generator to the PKCS11 library. So not only would I have to implement the setting, but the whole settings subsystem.
  • The code is big, because it supports a lot of features. Features I don't need or want. They get in the way of me as a user, and of me fixing the other issues.
  • The code is of Continue reading

Should I generate my keys in software or hardware?

A Hardware Security Module (HSM) is any hardware that you can use for crypto operations without revealing the crypto keys. Specifically I'm referring to the Yubikey NEO and TPM chips, but it should apply to other kinds of special hardware that does crypto operations. I'll refer to this hardware as the "device" as the general term, below.

Some background

When describing the Yubikey NEO I'm specifically referring to its public key crypto features that I've previously blogged about, that enable using Yubikey NEO for GPG and SSH, not its OTP generating features.

To generate keys for these devices you have two options. Either you tell the device to generate a key using a built in random number generator, or generate the key yourself and "import" it to the device. In either case you end up with some handle to the key, so that you command the device to do a crypto operation using the key with a given handle.

This "handle" is often the key itself, but encrypted with a key that has never existed outside the device, and never will. For TPMs they are encrypted (wrapped) with the SRK key. The SRK is always generated inside Continue reading

TPM chip protecting SSH keys

STOP! There is a better way. this post explains a simpler and more secure way.

Update 2: I have something I think will be better up my sleeve for using the TPM chip with SSH. Stay tuned. In the mean time, the below works.

Finally, I found out how to use a TPM chip to protect SSH keys. Thanks to Perry Lorier. I'm just going to note down those same steps, but with my notes.

I've written about hardware protecting crypto keys and increasing SSH security before:

but this is what I've always been after. With this solution the SSH key cannot be stolen. If someone uses this SSH key that means that the machine with the TPM chip is involved right now. Right now it's not turned off, or disconnected from the network.

Update: you need to delete /var/lib/opencryptoki/tpm/your-username/*.pem, because otherwise your keys will be migratable. I'm looking into how to either never generating these files, or making them unusable by having the TPM chip reject them. Update to come.

When I run this again on a completely blank system I'll add Continue reading

Fixing high CPU use on Cisco 7600/6500

Recently some time ago (this blog post has also been lying in draft for a while) someone came to me with a problem they had with a Cisco 7600. It felt sluggish and "show proc cpu" showed that the weak CPU was very loaded.

This is how I fixed it.

"show proc cpu history" showed that the CPU use had been high for quite a while, and too far back to check against any config changes. The CPU use of the router was not being logged outside of what this command can show.

"show proc cpu sorted" showed that almost all the CPU time was spent in interrupt mode. This is shown after the slash in the first row of the output. 15% in this example:

  Router# show proc cpu sorted
  CPU utilization for five seconds: 18%/15%; one minute: 31%; five minutes: 42%
  PID Runtime(ms)   Invoked      uSecs   5Sec   1Min   5Min TTY Process 
  198   124625752 909637916        137  0.87%  0.94%  0.94%   0 IP Input         
  [...]
  
Interrupt mode CPU time is (a bit simplified and restricted to the topic at hand) used when the router has to react to some user traffic. Now why would the 7600 use the Continue reading

Next-hop resolution and point-to-point

I had this blog post lying around as a draft for a long time. I didn't think it was was "meaty" enough yet, but since I'm no longer a network consultant I don't think it'll become any meatier. So here it goes.

Here I will describe the process of L3-to-L2 mapping, or next-hop resolution and how it works with point-to-point circuits like PPP, ATM and Frame relay. It's the process of finding out what to actually do with a packet once the relevant routing table entry has been identified.

It's deceptively simpler than on a LAN segment, but since people generally learn Ethernet before they learn point-to-point nowadays I'm writing it anyway.

When a packet is to be sent to an address on the same subnet a L3-to-L2 mapping is done to look up the L2 destination address (if any) to apply.

The packet is then encapsulated in a L2 frame and sent out the interface.

On a normal Ethernet LAN segment ARP is used to look up L3-to-L2, and the frame will then have that (L2) MAC address as its destination. The frame will then be received by (and only by) the intended destination.

In a point-to-point interface there Continue reading

1 4 5 6