Kernel of Truth season 2 episode 5: The power of community
Subscribe to Kernel of Truth on iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Cast Box and Sticher!
Click here for our previous episode.
From developer days to hackathons and from events to forums, Slack and social media included- there’s a community out there waiting for you! In this episode, host Brian talks to community evangelist for Nutanix Angelo Luciani and our own Pete Lumbis about the power of community and self-service. What are the perks, both personally and professionally, that you get when you’re actively participating in a community? What are some communities and resources we’ve found useful? Grab a taco, listen and find out. We promise you’ll get the taco reference after listening.
Guest Bios
Brian O’Sullivan: Brian currently heads Product Management for Cumulus Linux. For 15 or so years he’s held software Product Management positions at Juniper Networks as well as other smaller companies. Once he saw the change that was happening in the networking space, he decided to join Cumulus Networks to be a part of the open networking innovation. When not working, Brian is a voracious reader and has held a variety of jobs, including bartending in three countries and working as an extra in a German Continue reading
Canada’s Rogers Spends Big to Secure 600 MHz Spectrum for 5G
Bell decided against buying 600 MHz frequencies but said it looks forward to 3.5 GHz and millimeter...
Collaboration, Connectivity, and Self-Determination
Over 20 million people in North America lack access to fast, affordable, and reliable Internet. In October 2018, the Indigenous Connectivity Summit gathered over 150 Indigenous leaders, policymakers, network operators, and community members in the Canadian Arctic town of Inuvik to focus on a common goal: bringing fast, affordable, and reliable Internet to Indigenous communities. The event featured success stories of community networks across North America to demonstrate the power of communities to lead their own Internet solutions, and how anyone can support them.
Crystal Gail Fraser, a Gwichyà Gwich’in woman who calls Inuvik home, sees collaborative Internet solutions as a critical path to self-determination for her community.
As I stepped off the plane in Inuvik, I inhaled the arctic air. I observed the scenic landscape of Dinjii Zhuh (Gwich’in) and Inuvialuit territory, taking in the familiarity: the snow-covered rolling hills, stunted spruce trees, and ice crystals in the air.
land.
Photo credit: April Froncek
This land and all that it holds, means, and represents, has been critical to Dinjii Zhuh culture, economies, and lifestyles since Ts’ii Dęįį (Time Immemorial).
Open Networking & Distributed Cloud in the News
Open Networking The benefits of open networking were recently highlighted in Tech Target[i] by noted industry analyst Kevin Tolly of Tolly...Pentagon Narrows JEDI Cloud Contract Down to Amazon and Microsoft
The top two cloud providers are now vying for the largest federal IT project to date. Amazon is...
IoT Security Startup Armis Raises $65 Million Series C
The company saw 700% growth in annual revenue last year. Its customers include Mondelēz, Sysco...
Catchpoint Manages End-User Monitoring From Planning to Execution
The company released a managed offering of its monitoring platform, which provides both synthetic...
BGP Peering in the Real World
In this Network Collective Community Roundtable, we’re joined by Tom Ammon and Marijana Novakovic to talk about BGP peering in the real world.
Outro Music:
Danger Storm Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Dish Networks Views Virtualization as 5G’s ‘Real Paradigm Shift’
"When you move to virtualization and are doing in software what you do in hardware today, the...
Open Networking: Midlife Crisis or Middleware Curse?
Open Networking Summit (ONS) 2019: reflections of an industry in transition.
Internet of Things Devices as a DDoS Vector
As adoption of Internet of Things devices increases, so does the number of insecure IoT devices on the network. These devices represent an ever-increasing pool of computing and communications capacity open to misuse. They can be hijacked to spread malware, recruited to form botnets to attack other Internet users, and even used to attack critical national infrastructure, or the structural functions of the Internet itself (we give several examples from recent headlines in the Reference Section, below).
The problem this poses is what to do about IoT as a source of risk. This blog post includes reflections on events that came to light in recent weeks, sets out some thoughts about technical mitigations, and sketches out the boundaries of what we think can be done technically. Beyond those boundaries lie the realms of policy measures, which – while relevant to the big picture – are not the topic of this post.
Why are we exploring this issue now? Partly because of our current campaign to improve trust in consumer IoT devices.
And partly, also, because of recent reports that, as a step towards mitigating this risk, connected devices will be subjected to active probing, to detect whether or not they Continue reading
Security Collides With Multi-Million Dollar SD-WAN Market
The SD-WAN market is so hot right now that vendors, especially security companies, can’t help but...
Improved Solution: Create Network Diagram from LLDP Data
A long while ago I published a sample Ansible/NAPALM/Jinja2 solution that would take LLDP information and turn it into a network diagram (I described its details in a short video that’s accessible to anyone attending our network automation course or having an Expert subscription).
The trickiest part of that solution was detection of bidirectional links:
Read more ...Terraform your physical network with YANG
Every time when I get bored from my day job I tend to find some small interesting project that I can do that can give me an instant sense of accomplishment and as the result lift my spirits and improve motivation. So this time I remembered when someone once asked me if they could use Terraform to control their physical network devices and I had to explain how this is the wrong tool for the job. Somehow the question got stuck in my head and now it came to fruition in the form of terraform-yang.
This is a small Terraform plugin (provider) that allows users to manipulate interface-level settings of a network device. And I’m not talking about a VM in the cloud that runs network OS of your favourite vendor, this stuff is trivial and doesn’t require anything special from Terraform. I’m talking about Terraform controlling your individual physical network devices over an OpenConfig’s gNMI interface with standard Create/Read/Update/Delete operations exposed all the way to Terraform’s playbooks (or whatever they are called). Network Infrastructure as code nirvana…
Writing a custom Terraform provider for a network device
Although this may look scary at the beginning, the process of creating your Continue reading