QRNG generates random numbers without any pattern.
Intel helped fund the security product development.
SDS can help keep IT costs low while supporting new data-intensive initiatives.
One of the more interesting presentations we had during Tech Field Day Extra @ Cisco Live Berlin was coming from Paessler, a company developing PRTG, a little-known network monitoring software.
More about PRTG in TFD videos and here, here, here and here.
Read more ...We live in a hyper connected world – everything of value, from the apps, to the cloud, to the devices, to the users, is all closely tethered to one another. The network has become the critical platform that connects everything reliably and securely. IT must also evolve to support this new ecosystem of engagement. Ultimately, a lot has to happen for the network to deliver what customers need: a seamless and secure experience.
That’s why we’re looking Continue reading
The post Worth Reading: The future is hardware appeared first on rule 11 reader.
Decompressing simple ZIPi file can crash remote attackers
The post How to defend your website with ZIP bombs appeared first on EtherealMind.
TBR’s report shows 6.6% growth in connectivity services revenue for first quarter 2017.
SDN control and automation will set the stage for 5G deployments.
"No one dreamt of doing friendly user trials in LTE."
IBM is less expensive than rivals Microsoft, Google, or AWS.
The IETF published RFC8200 last week, which officially makes IPv6 an Internet Standard. While this move was a long time coming—IPv6 has now reached about 20% deployment—a more interesting question is: what has changed since RFC2460, which was a draft standard, was published in 2013? After all, the point of moving from the experimental to the draft standard to the internet standard states is to learn more about the protocol as it operates on the wire, and to make changes to improve deployability and performance.
Where would you look to determine what these changes might be? The IETF draft tracker tool, of course. If you look at the data tracker page for RFC8200, you will find a tab called history. From there, you have the option of looking at the revision differences, as shown below.
When you click on the wdiff button, you will see something like this—
In this case, I went back to the original version of the RFC2460bis draft (which just means the draft was designed to replace RFC2460). There are earlier versions of this draft from before it was accepted as a working group document, but even this comparison should give you some idea of the Continue reading