The post Worth Reading: Reopening the going dark debate appeared first on 'net work.
18 representatives, including many service providers, comprise the group.
It's CPU vs. GPU.
A lot of people seem to be looking forward to the day we build a network without an operator; to wit—
I hope not, because machines are more brittle than humans. Totally automated security fails much more often than security that uses a blend of people and algorithms. Machines do well at repetitive tasks, humans at catching the things that don’t fit into the algorithm’s state machine. Taking the person out of the network just means there’s no-one there to see when the state machine fails.
And it will fail—at some point. I know we like to believe that machines break less often, but I’m pretty certain there’s a counterpoint to this: when machines break, it’s more likely to be catastrophic. I’m not convinced replacing people with algorithms always reduces damage so much as move the potential damage around.
I hope not, because machines separate the decision from the decision maker. Continue reading