BrandPost: How to Know if An Active-Active Architecture Right for You
Software defined WANs (SD-WANs) have gained market momentum so quickly because their value proposition is multi-faceted. Some enterprises have looked to SD-WAN as a way to dramatically lower network transport costs, while others are building SD-WANs to automate network operations. One of the more common use-cases I have seen is to shift toward an “active-active” architecture.ACTIVE-ACTIVE WAN ARCHITECTUREHistorically, WANs are built on the concept of “active-passive”, where a branch can be connected using two or more links, but only the primary link is active and passing traffic. In this scenario, the backup connection only becomes active in the event the primary connection fails. While this might seem sensible, it’s highly inefficient as enterprises are paying for far more bandwidth than they are actually leveraging. This inefficient architectural design is driving increased interest in active-active configurations.To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
A “very large cloud service provider” is beta testing the product.
Microsoft is offering up to 100,000 Azure Event Grid usages per month for free.
Cisco led Springpath’s $34 million series C funding round in 2015.
Researchers used COTS hardware coupled with emulator software.
Tensions between DevOps departments and IT should lessen as companies like VMware try to make their software more accessible.