DC fabric design is more of an art than a science—a lot of factors come into play, such as future growth, lifecycle management, security, and costs. How can network engineers balance these various factors—how do they even know what questions to ask? Brooks Westrbook joins Tom Ammon and Russ White to discuss three- and five-stage DC fabric design, OPEX, CAPEX, and other topics on this episode of the Hedge.
OSPF Load Balancing is to place multiple next-hops into the Routing and Forwarding table for a given IP destination prefix. In this post, we will look at OSPF Load Balancing, OSPF Load Sharing, OSPF ECMP, OSPF UCMP, where we should use it, where we shouldn’t use it, and what can be dangerous if we have OSPF Load balancing will be explained.
What is OSPF Equal Cost Load Balancing let’s have a look at the below topology and let’s try to understand?
In the above topology, the 192.168.0.0/24 network is connected to Router D.
As a link-state routing protocol, OSPF routers in the network would know that the 192.168.0.0/24 subnet is connected to Router D.
And they would run SPF/Dijkstra algorithm to calculate the shortest path to this destination.
In the above topology, Interface costs are shown.
When we look at Router A to 192.168.0.0/24 subnet, we have two paths. A-B-D and A-C-D.
Both of the paths’ total cost is 10+10 = 20.
Thus, Router A can do load balancing for that destination prefix.
When OSPF has two paths, we don’t need to Continue reading
To Gerrit Kazmaier, the distinction between managed databases and data lakes has never made much sense, and it makes even less sense today as data is piling up like soaring mountains being pushed up by tectonic forces. …
Google BigLake Stretches BigQuery Across All Data was written by Jeffrey Burt at The Next Platform.
When parsing Apache web server logs on Linux, I find it interesting to monitor access requests resulting in HTTP status codes other than 200s. An HTTP status code in the 200s mean the request was successful, and hey–that’s boring.
I want to see the requests that my dear Apache instance is upset about. So the question becomes…how do I filter the logs to show me every entry that doesn’t have a status code in the 200s?
Let’s back our way into this. We’ll start with the answer, then explain how we got there.
This CLI incantation will get the job done.
sudo grep -E '\" [1345][01235][0-9] [[:digit:]]{1,8} \"' /var/log/apache2/access.log
If you’d like to watch the log entries scroll by in real time, try this.
sudo tail -f /var/log/apache2/access.log | grep -E '\" [1345][01235][0-9] [[:digit:]]{1,8} \"'
Let’s focus on the regular expression (regex) grep is using to find the matches. In plain English, the grep utility is using an extended -E regex to display all lines in the file /var/log/apache2/access.log matching the regex.
The regex portion of the command is as follows.
'\" [1345][01235][0-9] [[:digit:]]{1,8} \"'
The regex is enclosed in single quotes Continue reading
BGP AS Path Prepending or BGP prepend is a common technique for incoming path manipulating. When we want to engineer the traffic coming from another BGP AS to our BGP AS, BGP AS prepending is one of the most common mechanisms. There are cases BGP AS Prepend doesn’t work and shouldn’t be used as well, and in this post, we will look at them too by using the below topology.
In the above topology, we have two BGP Autonomous Systems. AS 200 is Customer BGP AS, and AS 100 is Provider BGP AS.
As a customer, AS 200 wants AS100 to send the traffic over the left path as a Primary path and the right path as a backup path as is depicted in the above topology.
When we want to have Primary and Backup Paths as it is depicted in the above topology. BGP AS Path Prepending technique is used to influence upstream BGP Autonomous Systems’ decision.
BGP Prepend means, adding our BGP AS to the AS-path multiple times. In the above topology, 10.0.10.0/24 network’s BGP AS 200 is advertised with 3 AS prepend. By default when the prefix is advertised to Continue reading
For those looking to try out Fujitsu’s Arm-based PRIMEHPC FX1000 system, the company is opening up the same capabilities via its own cloud service. …
Fujitsu Cloud Service to Put Fugaku Supercomputer in Reach was written by Nicole Hemsoth at The Next Platform.
One of my readers asked for my opinion about this question…
… and I promised something longer than 280 characters.
One of my readers asked for my opinion about this question…
… and I promised something longer than 280 characters.
Wouldn’t it be funny if Google ends up being the stalwart supporter of the X86 architecture among the hyperscalers and cloud builders? …
The Looming Arm Server Battle Between AWS And Microsoft was written by Timothy Prickett Morgan at The Next Platform.
This post originally appeared on the Packet Pushers’ Ignition site on April 16, 2021. If you work with network devices long enough, you will eventually encounter a device that is not working as expected. The phone calls from on-site personnel take the same general shape: Yes, the building has no connectivity; Yes, the router is […]
The post Device Management From The Ground Up: Part 6 – Working In ROMMON appeared first on Packet Pushers.
In this post, we will compare EIGRP and OSPF. We will look at some of the important aspects when we compare EIGRP vs OSPF. From scalability, standardization, working on different topologies and many aspects will be compared in this most detailed comparison blog post on the Internet.
We prepared the above comparison chart for EIGRP vs OSPF comparison. We will look at some of those important Comparison criteria from a design point of view.
OSPF supports two layers of Hiearchicy. OSPF Backbone areas and OSPF Non-backbone areas. EIGRP on the other side supports as many as you want. You can summarize EIGRP prefixes at every hop. This capability provides a scale advantage to EIGRP. In EIGRP, we don’t need an ABR node for summarization for example.
The full mesh may require a lot of logical connections, OSPF with Mesh-group feature can scale but it can be a scaling problem for the EIGRP networks. If we think that in real-life networks, EIGRP is usually used in Hub and Spoke topologies most of the time, expecting EIGRP to run on Full-mesh topologies is not Continue reading
In this post, we will compare BGP and OSPF. We will look at some of the important aspects when we compare BGP vs OSPF. Although OSPF is used as an IGP and BGP is used mainly as an External routing protocol, we will compare from many different design aspects. Also, BGP can be used as an Internal IGP protocol as well and we will take that into consideration as well.
We prepared the above comparison chart for BGP vs OSPF comparison. We will look at some of those important Comparison criteria from a design point of view.
One of the biggest reasons we choose BGP, not OSPF is Scalability. BGP is used as a Global Internet routing protocol and as of 2022, the Global routing table size for IPv4 unicast prefixes is around 900 000. So almost a million prefixes we carry over BGP on the Internet.
So, proven scalability for BGP we can say. OSPF usually can carry only a couple of thousands of prefixes, this is one of the reasons, OSPF is used as an Internal dynamic routing protocol, not over the Internet.
At some point, if Microsoft has its way, a substantial amount of computing that enterprise end users do on PCs could end up running in the cloud, and that could have a dramatic effect on the depth and breadth of the Azure cloud. …
How Much Will Windows 365 PCs Drive Azure Infrastructure? was written by Brandon Vigliarolo at The Next Platform.
Fresh off a record revenue quarter, Lenovo plans to add 12,000 R&D staff members to their global ranks over the next three years, according to the company’s Chairman and CEO, Yuanqing Yang. …
Lenovo Pushes Record Revenue into New R&D was written by Nicole Hemsoth at The Next Platform.