0

Validating SGT Inline with Netflow and Embedded Packet Capture

In the last article, Learning TrustSec, An Introduction to Inline Tagging, we took a quick look at manual configuration of SGT Inline Tagging in a manual configuration. We also performed some validation with show commands and proved the operation by enabling enforcement.

In today’s article, we will perform slightly deeper validation of the inline imposition itself. For this process, we will use Netflow and Embedded Packet Capture. I happen to know that there is already EIGRP traversing the link that will help produce some output. Let’s just jump right in with a very basic Netflow configuration.

Netflow Configuration

//you could additionally configure and exporter
//if there is a proper netflow collector

flow record my_record_output
 match flow cts source group-tag
 match flow cts destination group-tag
 match ipv4 source address
 match ipv4 destination address
 match ipv4 protocol
 match transport source-port
 match transport destination-port
flow monitor my_monitor_output
 record my_record_output
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
 description trunk to c9kSW2
 switchport mode trunk
 ip flow monitor my_monitor_output output
 cts manual
  policy static sgt 100 trusted

Verification Using Netflow

c9kSW1#show flow monitor my_monitor_output cache
  Cache type:                               Normal (Platform cache)
  Cache size:                                10000
  Current entries:                               1

  Flows added:                                   9
  Flows aged:                                    8
    - Active timeout      (  1800 secs)          2
    -  Continue reading

0

Validating SGT Inline with Netflow and Embedded Packet Capture

In the last article, Learning TrustSec, An Introduction to Inline Tagging, we took a quick look at manual configuration of SGT Inline Tagging in a manual configuration. We also performed some validation with show commands and proved the operation by enabling enforcement.

In today’s article, we will perform slightly deeper validation of the inline imposition itself. For this process, we will use Netflow and Embedded Packet Capture. I happen to know that there is already EIGRP traversing the link that will help produce some output. Let’s just jump right in with a very basic Netflow configuration.

Netflow Configuration

//you could additionally configure and exporter
//if there is a proper netflow collector

flow record my_record_output
 match flow cts source group-tag
 match flow cts destination group-tag
 match ipv4 source address
 match ipv4 destination address
 match ipv4 protocol
 match transport source-port
 match transport destination-port
flow monitor my_monitor_output
 record my_record_output
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
 description trunk to c9kSW2
 switchport mode trunk
 ip flow monitor my_monitor_output output
 cts manual
  policy static sgt 100 trusted

Verification Using Netflow

c9kSW1#show flow monitor my_monitor_output cache
  Cache type:                               Normal (Platform cache)
  Cache size:                                10000
  Current entries:                               1

  Flows added:                                   9
  Flows aged:                                    8
    - Active timeout      (  1800 secs)          2
    -  Continue reading

0

Validating SGT Inline with Netflow and Embedded Packet Capture

In the last article, Learning TrustSec, An Introduction to Inline Tagging, we took a quick look at manual configuration of SGT Inline Tagging in a manual configuration. We also performed some validation with show commands and proved the operation by enabling enforcement.

In today’s article, we will perform slightly deeper validation of the inline imposition itself. For this process, we will use Netflow and Embedded Packet Capture. I happen to know that there is already EIGRP traversing the link that will help produce some output. Let’s just jump right in with a very basic Netflow configuration.

Netflow Configuration

//you could additionally configure and exporter
//if there is a proper netflow collector

flow record my_record_output
 match flow cts source group-tag
 match flow cts destination group-tag
 match ipv4 source address
 match ipv4 destination address
 match ipv4 protocol
 match transport source-port
 match transport destination-port
flow monitor my_monitor_output
 record my_record_output
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
 description trunk to c9kSW2
 switchport mode trunk
 ip flow monitor my_monitor_output output
 cts manual
  policy static sgt 100 trusted

Verification Using Netflow

c9kSW1#show flow monitor my_monitor_output cache
  Cache type:                               Normal (Platform cache)
  Cache size:                                10000
  Current entries:                               1

  Flows added:                                   9
  Flows aged:                                    8
    - Active timeout      (  1800 secs)          2
    -  Continue reading

0

Masergy Picks Bitglass Cloud Security Tech for Managed CASB Service

The managed security service provider tested Netskope’s and McAfee Skyhigh’s technology before choosing Bitglass.

0

Up and Running with Kubernetes and Tungsten Fabric

I have a predominantly technical background. You can show me all the slide decks you want but until I can get my hands on it, it’s not real to me. This has greatly influenced what I’m focusing on now that I’m doing more than just technical work - how to reduce the barrier to entry for people to become acquainted with a project or product.

As a result, I’ve been getting more involved with Tungsten Fabric (formerly OpenContrail). Tungsten is an open source Software-Defined Networking platform, and is a healthy candidate for building some tutorials. In addition, I’m new to the project in general - so, even if only for my own benefit, a blog post summarizing a quick and hopefully easy way to get up and running with it seems quite appropos.

Introduction to the Lab Environment

We’re going to spin up a 3-node cluster in AWS EC2 running Kubernetes, and using Tungsten Fabric for the networking. Why AWS instead of something like Vagrant? Simply put, a lot of advanced networking software require a lot of system resources - more than most laptops are able to provide. In this case, a total of four virtual machines (three-node cluster plus Continue reading

0

Up and Running with Kubernetes and Tungsten Fabric

I have a predominantly technical background. You can show me all the slide decks you want but until I can get my hands on it, it’s not real to me. This has greatly influenced what I’m focusing on now that I’m doing more than just technical work - how to reduce the barrier to entry for people to become acquainted with a project or product. As a result, I’ve been getting more involved with Tungsten Fabric (formerly OpenContrail).

0

Up and Running with Kubernetes and Tungsten Fabric

I have a predominantly technical background. You can show me all the slide decks you want but until I can get my hands on it, it’s not real to me. This has greatly influenced what I’m focusing on now that I’m doing more than just technical work - how to reduce the barrier to entry for people to become acquainted with a project or product. As a result, I’ve been getting more involved with Tungsten Fabric (formerly OpenContrail).

0

Unveiling Cognitive Campus Networking

At Arista Networks, the status quo inspires us to innovate and continue our mission to reinvent the network – from ­­cloud to client. Today, we’re continuing that journey – into the campus network. Let’s face it; the legacy three-tier architecture of access-aggregation-core is wasteful and oversubscribed – creating a perfect storm for market transitions and Arista innovation.

0

Unveiling Cognitive Campus Networking

At Arista Networks, the status quo inspires us to innovate and continue our mission to reinvent the network – from ­­cloud to client. Today, we’re continuing that journey – into the campus network. Let’s face it; the legacy three-tier architecture of access-aggregation-core is wasteful and oversubscribed – creating a perfect storm for market transitions and Arista innovation.

0

CloudVision: A Cognitive Management Plane

The last 40 years have seen tremendous growth and progress in the data networking industry. Ethernet, IP, MPLS, GRE, IPsec, MACsec, and VXLAN enable operators to build secure, multiservice, high-performance data planes that interoperate across multiple vendors, multiple operators, and multiple administrative domains. Likewise, BGP, OSPF, IS-IS, LDP, RSVP, BFD, LACP, L3VPN, VPLS, and EVPN enable operators to build scalable multi-vendor control planes that federate across organizational boundaries, supporting mission-critical networks with global reach.

0

CloudVision: A Cognitive Management Plane

The last 40 years have seen tremendous growth and progress in the data networking industry. Ethernet, IP, MPLS, GRE, IPsec, MACsec, and VXLAN enable operators to build secure, multiservice, high-performance data planes that interoperate across multiple vendors, multiple operators, and multiple administrative domains. Likewise, BGP, OSPF, IS-IS, LDP, RSVP, BFD, LACP, L3VPN, VPLS, and EVPN enable operators to build scalable multi-vendor control planes that federate across organizational boundaries, supporting mission-critical networks with global reach.

0

IDG Contributor Network: Container security: crafting application identity

Over the years, we have embraced new technologies to find improved ways to build systems.  As a result, today's infrastructures have undergone significant evolution. To keep pace with the arrival of new technologies, legacy is often combined with the new, but they do not always mesh well. Such fusion between ultra-modern and conventional has created drag in the overall solution, thereby, spawning tension between past and future in how things are secured.The multi-tenant shared infrastructure of the cloud, container technologies like Docker and Kubernetes, and new architectures like microservices and serverless, while technically remarkable, increase complexity. Complexity is the number one enemy of security. Therefore, to be effectively aligned with adoption of these technologies, a new approach to security is required that does not depend on shifting infrastructure as the control point.To read this article in full, please click here

0

IDG Contributor Network: Container security: crafting application identity

Over the years, we have embraced new technologies to find improved ways to build systems.  As a result, today's infrastructures have undergone significant evolution. To keep pace with the arrival of new technologies, legacy is often combined with the new, but they do not always mesh well. Such fusion between ultra-modern and conventional has created drag in the overall solution, thereby, spawning tension between past and future in how things are secured.The multi-tenant shared infrastructure of the cloud, container technologies like Docker and Kubernetes, and new architectures like microservices and serverless, while technically remarkable, increase complexity. Complexity is the number one enemy of security. Therefore, to be effectively aligned with adoption of these technologies, a new approach to security is required that does not depend on shifting infrastructure as the control point.To read this article in full, please click here

0

Worth Reading: Data center interconnect and performance

What factors influence the performance of a high-speed, high-latency data center interconnect? Redundant data centers are common, providing organizations with business continuity. But how far apart is too far for good, reliable application performance? —Terry Slattery @Netcraftsmen

0

Blacklisting modules on Linux

The Linux kernel is modular — composed of modules that work together but are largely independent of each other. New functionality can be added when a kernel module is loaded, but there are times when you might need to block functionality because modules interfere with each other or leave a system vulnerable. When that is the case, you can restrict what modules the kernel is able to use by blacklisting the troublemakers. This blocks them from being loaded.Listing Kernel modules You can list kernel modules with the lsmod command. For a taste of what you’re likely to see, the lsmod command below shows us the top of the lsmod command output on a sample system.To read this article in full, please click here

0

Aqua Security Sprinkles Support Over CRI-O Kubernetes Runtime Platform

CRI-O was launched as a lighter alternative to using Docker as the runtime for Kubernetes.

0

HPE Says Software Is Nimble Storage’s ‘Secret Sauce’

Nimble platforms now support Storage Class Memory (SCM) and NVMe for super-fast, low-latency flash storage.

0

Why is the Feasibility Condition Less Than?

A reader recently emailed me with this question: Why isn’t the condition for a Feasible Successor set to less than (<), rather than less than of equal (<=), in EIGRP? It certainly seems, as noted in the email, that this rules out a lot of possible possible loop free alternate paths. The network below will be used to illustrate.

First, assume all links are cost of 1 except D->C, which is cost of 2. Here D will choose B as the Successor, and the FC will be set to 2. The RD of C will be 1, so C will be an FS. Now consider two failures. The first failure is D->B. D will immediately reroute to the FS, which is C, without changing the FC. This works, because C’s cost to 100::/64 via D is 4, much higher than it’s cost to 100::64 along C->A. Now consider what happens if A->100::/64 fails. If the timing of the query “works right,” C and B will be notified first, then finally D. Even if D is somehow notified before C, and D switches to C as its FS, the traffic is dropped, rather than looped—so all is happy.

Now change the situation a little. Assume the A->C link is cost Continue reading

0

Nokia Snaps Up IoT Energy Startup SpaceTime

SpaceTime’s CEO Rob Schilling, a former general manager at SAP, will join Nokia’s IoT unit.

0

Tune in to Our Q&A tomorrow!

Don’t miss our CCNA/CCNP Kickoff with Keith Bogart Tomorrow!

 

Join Keith May 8th at 10 am PST/ 1 pm EST for his CCNA/CCNP Kickoff.

This is a FREE live session that is open to everyone. In this open forum, you’ll have the opportunity to ask Keith all of your questions regarding the CCNA or CCNP Routing & Switching exam and related technologies.

Get all of your questions answered by an experienced industry expert! Just click here.