Unlucky in a 2012 BlackBerry lawsuit, Mformation has now been picked up by Alcatel-Lucent.
With 25GbE costing just 1.4 times that total cost of 10GbE, its time to start considering whether 25GbE is right for you. For many data centres, this might mean skipping 10GbE products completely.
The post Musing: Skipping 10Gig Ethernet and Going Direct to 25Gigabit ? appeared first on EtherealMind.
Covering the technology bases, Intel makes its latest round of investments.
NEC Director of Business Development Don Clark shares the latest SDN deployment lessons and guidelines in a special SDxCentral webinar based on the SDxCentral SDN Controller Report.
Cloud has been a three-year 'startup' inside Oracle. Time to grow.
Hurry up and register! Tomorrow is the Ericsson DemoFriday!
The post Worth Reading: The blame pipeline appeared first on 'net work.
I’ve been working with an ISP that is going to be using a large amount of configuration in the ‘groups’ section. The statements there will be inherited into the main configuration using the ‘apply-groups’ statement.
This is a clever way of writing commands once and having them apply to multiple parts of the configuration. At a basic level you could match on interfaces beginning with ‘ge-‘ or ‘xe-‘ and set an MTU on them all using one group statement. This MTU setting would not appear in the main configuration unless the configuration was displayed using “show | display inheritance”. There’s a nice explanation of how groups work over at this Packetpushers blog.
The downside is that if large amounts of configuration work is done in groups, applying the config can become slow during the ‘commit’ process.
What happens under the hood when the user issues a commit in Junos? You can see what happens if you issue a ‘commit | display detail’. There is an example in this KB article. As you can see there is a lot of parsing for commit-scripts, interface ranges and apply-groups at the start. The config in these needs to be expanded and incorporated Continue reading
I’ve been working with an ISP that is going to be using a large amount of configuration in the ‘groups’ section. The statements there will be inherited into the main configuration using the ‘apply-groups’ statement.
This is a clever way of writing commands once and having them apply to multiple parts of the configuration. At a basic level you could match on interfaces beginning with ‘ge-‘ or ‘xe-‘ and set an MTU on them all using one group statement. This MTU setting would not appear in the main configuration unless the configuration was displayed using “show | display inheritance”. There’s a nice explanation of how groups work over at this Packetpushers blog.
The downside is that if large amounts of configuration work is done in groups, applying the config can become slow during the ‘commit’ process.
What happens under the hood when the user issues a commit in Junos? You can see what happens if you issue a ‘commit | display detail’. There is an example in this KB article. As you can see there is a lot of parsing for commit-scripts, interface ranges and apply-groups at the start. The config in these needs to be expanded and incorporated Continue reading
Original content from Roger's CCIE Blog Tracking the journey towards getting the ultimate Cisco Certification. The Routing & Switching Lab Exam
In my opinion F5 are the market leader in load balancing appliances. If you are just starting out and want to get some experience on the platform how do you do it? With a new F5 4000s coming in around $30,000 its not a cheap box to put in your lab. The answer is the F5 virtual […]
Post taken from CCIE Blog
Original post F5 Virtual Appliance – How to install the VE LTM on ESXi