Does Network Lifecycle Management Make Sense?

 

SDN Lifecycle Management

Recently, we met with a friend who has done an amazing job of understanding the lifecycle management of virtual machines (VMs). As the CTO of a very large cloud provider, he explained in deep detail how he took advantage of Moore’s Law and doubled the amount of VMs in each rack each year, while maintaining or shrinking the cost per rack. As a result, he has doubled the amount of earning potential in each data center while driving cost down, even as his staff is ripping out servers long before their traditional three- to four-year lifecycle and purchasing new ones. He is buying servers at a 3-to-1 ratio over a three-year period when compared with a typical server lifecycle, yet his cost to operate the data center is going down and his productivity is going up by 2x every year.  Amazing!

While we enjoyed learning of his success, when we hear these stories, we think “Could this have the same type of impact somewhere in the network?” It got us to ask why customers traditionally hang on to their top-of-rack switches for four or five years and sometimes longer.

What is different about the network versus servers?

Obviously, Continue reading

SAN Automation with Python and Jinja

One of my least favorite things to do in my day job is create or maintain a zoning configuration on a fibre channel switch, such as a Cisco Nexus or MDS. It’s tedious, very error prone, and annoying when changes need to be made. I wrote earlier in the week on the value of using a templating language like Jinja to define the structure of a switch configuration, but dynamic enough to accept all kinds of input from some higher-level intelligence elsewhere.

SAN Automation with Python and Jinja

One of my least favorite things to do in my day job is create or maintain a zoning configuration on a fibre channel switch, such as a Cisco Nexus or MDS. It’s tedious, very error prone, and annoying when changes need to be made. I wrote earlier in the week on the value of using a templating language like Jinja to define the structure of a switch configuration, but dynamic enough to accept all kinds of input from some higher-level intelligence elsewhere.

How to become a network engineer

Original content from Roger's CCIE Blog Tracking the journey towards getting the ultimate Cisco Certification. The Routing & Switching Lab Exam
If you have arrived on this page then I would assume  you know what a network engineer is and would like to find out how to become a network engineer? If you are not sure what a network engineer is or does then the picture below explains it very well Picture courtesy of http://perceptionvsfact.com/ A […]

Other pages of interest:

Post taken from CCIE Blog

Original post How to become a network engineer

Troubleshooting with Wireshark [Riverbed lab kit]

A while ago I attended a Wireshark webinar from Riverbed in which they presented the tool, some beginner and intermediate users troubleshooting scenarios and some lab kit. Now I got an e-mail that they made it available for download at http://www.riverbed.com/wireshark-virtual-tour Part of this Lab Kit were available in the Virtual World Tour 2014 webinar […]

Three reasons why Networking is a pain in the IaaS, and how to fix it

In this post I share the slides, audio recording, and short outline of a presentation I gave at the Melbourne VMUG conference (Feb 2014) called “Three reasons why Networking is a pain in the IaaS, and how to fix it”.

As network technologists we know that when the compute architecture changes, the network architecture changes with it. Consider the precedent. The transition from mainframe to rack servers brought about Ethernet and top-of-rack switches. Blade servers introduced the blade switch and a cable-less network. And of course the virtual server necessitating the software virtual switch and a hardware-less network. At each iteration, we observe the architecture change occurring at the edge, directly adjacent to compute.

We can look at this superficially and say, “yes, the network architecture changed”. However if you think about it, the catalyzing change in each shift was the operational model, with intent to increase agility and reduce costs. The architecture change was consequential. Without compute, there is no reason for a network. Networking, both as a profession and technology, exists as a necessary service layer for computing. Without a network, computing is practically useless. As such, the capabilities of the network will either enable or impede Continue reading

Three reasons why Networking is a pain in the IaaS, and how to fix it

In this post I share the slides, audio recording, and short outline of a presentation I gave at the Melbourne VMUG conference (Feb 2014) called “Three reasons why Networking is a pain in the IaaS, and how to fix it”.

As network technologists we know that when the compute architecture changes, the network architecture changes with it. Consider the precedent. The transition from mainframe to rack servers brought about Ethernet and top-of-rack switches. Blade servers introduced the blade switch and a cable-less network. And of course the virtual server necessitating the software virtual switch and a hardware-less network. At each iteration, we observe the architecture change occurring at the edge, directly adjacent to compute.

We can look at this superficially and say, “yes, the network architecture changed”. However if you think about it, the catalyzing change in each shift was the operational model, with intent to increase agility and reduce costs. The architecture change was consequential. Without compute, there is no reason for a network. Networking, both as a profession and technology, exists as a necessary service layer for computing. Without a network, computing is practically useless. As such, the capabilities of the network will either enable or impede Continue reading

Three reasons why Networking is a pain in the IaaS, and how to fix it

In this post I share the slides, audio recording, and short outline of a presentation I gave at the Melbourne VMUG conference (Feb 2014) called “Three reasons why Networking is a pain in the IaaS, and how to fix it”.

As network technologists we know that when the compute architecture changes, the network architecture changes with it. Consider the precedent. The transition from mainframe to rack servers brought about Ethernet and top-of-rack switches. Blade servers introduced the blade switch and a cable-less network. And of course the virtual server necessitating the software virtual switch and a hardware-less network. At each iteration, we observe the architecture change occurring at the edge, directly adjacent to compute.

We can look at this superficially and say, “yes, the network architecture changed”. However if you think about it, the catalyzing change in each shift was the operational model, with intent to increase agility and reduce costs. The architecture change was consequential. Without compute, there is no reason for a network. Networking, both as a profession and technology, exists as a necessary service layer for computing. Without a network, computing is practically useless. As such, the capabilities of the network will either enable or impede Continue reading

Learn Python

Around six years ago, I decided to start a website called packetlife.net. Maybe you've heard of it. Most people turn to a purpose-built content management system like Wordpress or Drupal for such an endeavor, but I needed greater flexibility to achieve some of the projects I had in mind. This meant I needed to learn a programming language and write a good amount of the site's logic myself.

I already had some experience dabbling in PHP, but wasn't thrilled with it. I figured if I was going to learn a new language, it should be useful as a general purpose language and not just for building a web site. After a bit of research and deliberation, I chose Python (and the Django web framework).

The purpose of this post is to convince networkers with little to no experience writing code to learn Python. In the past I've encouraged fellow networkers to pick up any programming language, as it's more important to think like a programmer than it is to gain proficiency in a particular language. However, I've realized that many people get stuck on which language they want to learn, lose motivation, and end up not growing proficient Continue reading

OpenDaylight at Networking Field Day 7

Networking Field Day 7 was the third Tech Field Day event I attended as a delegate, and as expected, it was a blast. Its always good to be reunited with old friends, especially in this kind of environment, where constant technical discussions are…….well, they’re just going to happen. There were certainly some common undertones in every single presentation. One big example is OpenDaylight - nearly every vendor had at least something to say about it.

OpenDaylight at Networking Field Day 7

Networking Field Day 7 was the third Tech Field Day event I attended as a delegate, and as expected, it was a blast. Its always good to be reunited with old friends, especially in this kind of environment, where constant technical discussions are…….well, they’re just going to happen. There were certainly some common undertones in every single presentation. One big example is OpenDaylight - nearly every vendor had at least something to say about it.

Integrated hybrid OpenFlow control of HP switches

Performance optimizing hybrid OpenFlow controller describes InMon's sFlow-RT controller. The controller makes use of the sFlow and OpenFlow standards and is optimized for real-time traffic engineering applications that managing large traffic flows, including: DDoS mitigation, ECMP load balancing, LAG load balancing, large flow marking etc.

The previous article provided an example of large flow marking using an Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch 6900 switch. This article discusses how to replicate the example using HP Networking switches.

At present, the following HP switch models are listed as having OpenFlow support:
  • FlexFabric 12900 Switch Series
  • 12500 Switch Series
  • FlexFabric 11900 Switch Series
  • 8200 zl Switch Series
  • HP FlexFabric 5930 Switch Series
  • 5920 Switch Series
  • 5900 Switch Series
  • 5400 zl Switch Series
  • 3800 Switch Series
  • HP 3500 and 3500 yl Switch Series
  • 2920 Switch Series 
Note: All of the above HP switches (and many others) support the sFlow standard - see sFlow Products: Network Equipment @ sFlow.org.

HP's OpenFlow implementation supports integrated hybrid mode - provided the OpenFlow controller pushes a default low priority OpenFlow rule that matches all packets and applies the NORMAL action (i.e. instructs the switch to apply default switching / routing forwarding to the packets).

In Continue reading

Network Configuration Templates Using Jinja2

We’ve all been there at some point in our careers - especially those that work for VARs. You’re presented with a bunch of new gear that needs to be configured and deployed, and you’re tasked with making the magic happen. It was great to wake up yesterday to read Jason Edelman’s post on Ansible for networking - taking an approach to network automation that’s built upon existing, proven tools just makes sense, especially for the use case of initial configuration, but hopefully beyond.

Network Configuration Templates Using Jinja2

We’ve all been there at some point in our careers - especially those that work for VARs. You’re presented with a bunch of new gear that needs to be configured and deployed, and you’re tasked with making the magic happen. It was great to wake up yesterday to read Jason Edelman’s post on Ansible for networking - taking an approach to network automation that’s built upon existing, proven tools just makes sense, especially for the use case of initial configuration, but hopefully beyond.

Dell Aims for the Clouds with Z9500 Spine

While at Networking Field Day 7, we got a small preview of a new switch Dell Networking has just announced, the Z9500. At some point I’ll have another post coming discussing more of Dell’s presentation at NFD7, but I wanted to briefly talk about this new product and what it brings to the table for Dell.

To be frank, Dell’s acquisition of Force10 Networks originally felt to me like a “me too” play so that Dell could compete with Cisco UCS and HP in the “full data center stack” play combining compute, storage, and networking in a single SKU or a playbook of blessed configurations. I wasn’t really expecting Dell to innovate all that much in this space. But based on the information I have at this point, I think that position is unfounded.
Here’s a picture of the new beast from a demo rack Dell showed us at NFD:
Dell Z9500

Dell Z9500

To summarize the hardware: it’s a hell of a lot of density. The Z9500 platform presents 132 line-rate 40G ports in a 3RU chassis. So, if one were inclined, one could potentially cram 14 such chassis into a standard 42RU cabinet to concentrate 1,848 40G ports into Continue reading

Ordered FIB

In a past post, we’ve discussed microloops in link state protocols. If we examine a small ring topology (if you come to my Interop talk, you’ll discover that ring topologies are the heart of network convergence), we can see where and how a microloop forms. If the link between A and B fails, A and […]

Author information

Russ White

Russ White
Principle Engineer at Ericsson

Russ White is a Network Architect who's scribbled a basket of books, penned a plethora of patents, written a raft of RFCs, taught a trencher of classes, and done a lot of other stuff you either already know about, or don't really care about. You want numbers and letters? Okay: CCIE 2635, CCDE 2007:001, CCAr, BSIT, MSIT (Network Design & Architecture, Capella University), MACM (Biblical Literature, Shepherds Theological Seminary). Russ is a Principal Engineer in the IPOS Team at Ericsson, where he works on lots of different stuff, serves on the Routing Area Directorate at the IETF, and is a cochair of the Internet Society Advisory Council. Russ will be speaking in November at the Ericsson Technology Day. he recently published The Art of Network Architecture, is currently working on a new book in the area Continue reading

Putting the Application in SDN

Putting the Application in SDN

by Steve Harriman, VP of Marketing  - March 25, 2014

We would like to highlight a couple of recent articles about SDN that reflect Packet Design’s perspective on the technology. Arthur Cole wrote in Enterprise Networking Planet about “SDN in the Enterprise: It’s the Applications, Stupid.” He rightly asserts that the value of SDN isn’t in the architecture itself, but in the applications that the environment supports. It is understandable that during the genesis of a technology, the majority of effort is spent in making it work, but we should not lose site of the fact that optimal application performance is the key to deploying SDN more broadly. And we as an industry are not nearly ready to effectively manage applications across software-defined networks.

IsaacMao via Compfight cc 

In fact, Cole cites an article written by our own CTO Cengiz Alaettinoglu in Data Center Knowledge about how traditional, manual management methods are inadequate in a programmable, automated network environment. We need to automate network management best practices and processes to give human operators the visibility and control needed to adequately manage SDN applications in the data center and across the WAN. Continue reading

Performance optimizing hybrid OpenFlow controller

The latest release of InMon's sFlow-RT controller adds integrated hybrid OpenFlow support - optimized for real-time traffic engineering applications that manage large traffic flows, including: DDoS mitigation, ECMP load balancing, LAG load balancing, large flow marking etc.

This article discusses the evolving architecture of software defined networking (SDN) and the role of analytics and traffic engineering. InMon's sFlow-RT controller is used to provide practical examples of the architecture.
Figure 1: Fabric: A Retrospective on Evolving SDN
The article, Fabric: A Retrospective on Evolving SDN by Martin Casado, Teemu Koponen, Scott Shenker, and Amin Tootoonchian, makes the case for a two tier software defined networking (SDN) architecture; comprising a smart edge and an efficient core. The article, Pragmatic software defined networking on this blog, examines how the edge is moving into virtual switches, with tunneling (VxLAN, NVGRE, GRE, STT) used to virtualize the network and decouple the edge from the core. As complex policy decisions move to the network edge, the core fabric is left with the task of efficiently managing physical resources in order to deliver low latency, high bandwidth connectivity between edge switches.

First generation SDN controllers were designed before the edge / core split became Continue reading
1 … 3,701 3,702 3,703 3,704 3,705 … 3,793