Archive

Category Archives for "Networking"

Learning TrustSec – An Introduction to Inline Tagging

In my last article, Basic TrustSec – Implementing Manual SGTs and SGACLs,
we talked about a basic TrustSec configuration. In that example, we shared the understanding of having two devices connected to a single switch and enforcing traffic policies via SGACL. We know that there are more scalable and automated ways to configure TrustSec enabled networks, but our goal is to work toward understanding the building blocks.

In today’s article, we will expand our knowledge and connect the two devices to different switches. The trunks between these switches will be configured to carry the associated source SGT’s (Security Group Tags). The topology used for this discussion is as follows.

Topology

To demonstrate the topic of inline SGT, we will need to accomplish the following.

  1. Configure and Confirm that 192.168.254.11 (connected to c9kSW1) is recognized by its switch with an SGT of 2.
  2. Configure and Confirm that 192.168.254.100 (connected to c9kSW2) is recognized by its switch with an SGT of 3.
  3. Configure the trunk between the switches to carry SGTs
  4. Configure an enforcement policy to demonstrate overall functionality

Configuration Steps

c9kSW1 configuration/confirmation for host port

//We are using static SGT and need to do IP Device  Continue reading

MTU (Maximum Transmit Unit) and MSS (Maximum Segment Size)

What is difference  between MTU and MSS ? Most frequent question asked on the internet by networking guys.Hope this post will answer all queries related to MTU and MSS. As per Wikipedia , the maximum transmission unit (MTU) is the size of the largest protocol data unit (PDU) that can be communicated in a single, network layer, transaction , that […]

Zero Trust. Maximize Network Virtualization and Micro-segmentation

 

It’s official: when it comes to security threats, the question IT teams should be asking is not if but when. VMware recently commissioned Forrester Consulting to evaluate how organizations are improving the security of their infrastructure through network virtualization and micro-segmentation. Analysis found that 92% of respondents reported having faced minor security incidents in the last 12 months alone, while 65% of respondents endured a major incident in the same time span. These figures seal the deal; the naïve days of preparing for potential issues are long gone. Cyber threats are real, imminent, and happen often.

 

 

Companies today attribute more of their security issues to improper network segmentation than to the volume of threats overall. In response, leaders across industries are turning to network virtualization – specifically the Zero Trust security model – as a key strategy in combating threats. This strategy posits that whether a network is labeled secure or insecure, both should be treated as equally vulnerable. Further, the Zero Trust model supports the argument that ”traditional, perimeter-based security configurations are no longer a sufficient measure for protecting the network, and highlights steps companies can take to better secure their network, starting with network virtualization Continue reading

Link Propagation 117

Welcome to Link Propagation, a Packet Pushers newsletter. Link Propagation is included in your free membership. Each week we scour the InterWebs to find the most relevant practitioner blog posts, tech news, and product announcements. We drink from the fire hose so you can sip from a coffee cup. Blogs How Real Life Can Change […]

Transitioning Away From Legacy IT

One of the more exciting things I saw at Dell Technologies World this week was the announcement by VMware that they are supporting Microsoft Azure now in additional to AWS. It’s interesting because VMware is trying to provide a proven, stable migration path for companies that are wanting to move to the cloud but still retain their investments in VMware and legacy virtualization. But is offing legacy transition a good idea?

Hold On For One More Day

If I were to mention VLAN 1002-1005 to networking people, they would likely jump up and tell me that I was crazy. Because those VLANs are not valid on any Cisco switches save for the Nexus line. But why? What makes these forbidden? Unless you’re studying for your CCIE you probably just know these are bad and move on.

Turns out, they are a legacy transition mechanism from the IOS-SX days. 1002 and 1004 were designed to bridge FDDI-to-Ethernet, and 1003 and 1005 did the same for Token Ring. As Greg Ferro points out here, this code was tightly bound into IOS-SX and likely couldn’t be removed for fear of breaking the OS. The reservation continued forward in all IOS branches except Continue reading

Show 388: The Future Of Networking With Kyle Mestery

The Future of Networking series continues with guest Kyle Mestery.

Kyle is well known to many corners of the networking community including the open source community. He recently re-joined Cisco as a Distinguished Engineer.

We talk with Kyle to get his take on where the packets are flowing over the next several years, including the tech conference scene, open-source networking, the proliferation of open-source networking OSs, what’s inside Open Network Linux (ONL), and cloud-native network functions virtualization.

Sponsor: ThousandEyes

ThousandEyes gives you performance visibility from every user to every app over any network, both internal and external, so you can smoothly migrate to the cloud, transform your WAN, troubleshoot faster and deliver exceptional user experiences. Sign up for a free account at thousandeyes.com/packetpushers and choose a free ThousandEyes t-shirt.

Show Links:

Silicon Loons.com – Kyle’s blog

Kyle on Twitter

Network Service Mesh – GitHub

Three Years On: Open Standards, Open Source, Open Loop – Cisco Systems

Verizon Launches Virtual Service Bundles – Light Reading

The post Show 388: The Future Of Networking With Kyle Mestery appeared first on Packet Pushers.