In today's WAN, network administrators need to complement traditional SNMP-based tools with active monitoring. NetBeez lets administrators constantly monitor end-to-end connectivity and performance for every site.
The post Simplifying WAN Complexity With Active Monitoring appeared first on Packet Pushers.
In today's WAN, network administrators need to complement traditional SNMP-based tools with active monitoring. NetBeez lets administrators constantly monitor end-to-end connectivity and performance for every site.
The post Simplifying WAN Complexity With Active Monitoring appeared first on Packet Pushers.
Here he comes to save the day! Serving, protecting, and troubleshooting -- 24-7-365.
This post was written by Marek Vavruša and Jaime Cochran, who found out they were both independently working on the same glibc vulnerability attack vectors at 3am last Tuesday.
A buffer overflow error in GNU libc DNS stub resolver code was announced last week as CVE-2015-7547. While it doesn't have any nickname yet (last year's Ghost was more catchy), it is potentially disastrous as it affects any platform with recent GNU libc—CPEs, load balancers, servers and personal computers alike. The big question is: how exploitable is it in the real world?
It turns out that the only mitigation that works is patching. Please patch your systems now, then come back and read this blog post to understand why attempting to mitigate this attack by limiting DNS response sizes does not work.
But first, patch!
Let's start with the PoC from Google, it uses the first attack vector described in the vulnerability announcement. First, a 2048-byte UDP response forces buffer allocation, then a failure response forces a retry, and finally the last two answers smash the stack.
$ echo "nameserver 127.0.0.1" | sudo tee /etc/resolv.conf
$ sudo python poc. Continue reading
A look at the vendor-neutral WiFi certifications offered by the Certified Wireless Network Professional program.
Hopes run high for 5G at Mobile World Congress as the industry awaits a standard for the emerging technology.
Everyone talks about public or hybrid clouds, whitebox switching with home-grown networking operating system, or SDN nirvana, but whenever I talk with enterprise-focused architects, consultants or vendor SEs, I see a totally different story.
Here's a typical response I'm getting from engineers in this group: “I work with multinational financial customers, and in this group hybrid cloud is not even a topic. They do private cloud projects, with some of them looking into public cloud deployments of isolated projects on base AWS functionality.”
Read more ...OSPF Area Types – Different Areas in OSPF are used to create smaller fault domains.There are totally two OSPF area types. OSPF Backbone area and OSPF non backbone area. Backbone area in OSPF is Area 0. OSPF prevents loop by using backbone area concept.All the non-backbone areas should be connected to the Backbone area. There are […]
The post OSPF Area Types appeared first on Orhanergun.
OSPF Area Types – Different Areas in OSPF are used to create smaller fault domains. There are two OSPF area types in total. OSPF Backbone area and OSPF non-backbone area Backbone area in OSPF is Area 0. OSPF prevents loop by using backbone area concept.All the non-backbone areas should be connected to the Backbone area. There […]
The post OSPF Area Types appeared first on Cisco Network Design and Architecture | CCDE Bootcamp | orhanergun.net/newwp.
OSPF Area Types – Different Areas in OSPF are used to create smaller fault domains. There are two OSPF area types in total. OSPF Backbone area and OSPF non-backbone area Backbone area in OSPF is Area 0. OSPF prevents loop by using backbone area concept.All the non-backbone areas should be connected to the Backbone area. There […]
The post OSPF Area Types appeared first on Cisco Network Design and Architecture | CCDE Bootcamp | orhanergun.net.