Reaction: Why Safe Harbors will Fail
Copyright law, at least in the United States, tends to be very strict. You can copy some portion of a work under “fair use” rules, but, for most works, you must ask permission before sharing content created by someone else. But what about content providers? If a content provider user uploads a “song cover,” for instance—essentially a remake of a popular song, not intended to create commercial value for the individual user—should the provider be required to take the content down as a violation of copyright? Content providers argue they should not be required to remove such content. For instance, in a recent article published by the EFF—
Platform safe harbors have been in the crosshairs of copyright industry lobbyists throughout 2017. All year EFF has observed them advancing their plans around the world to weaken or eliminate the legal protections that have enabled the operation of platforms as diverse as YouTube, the Internet Archive, Reddit, Medium, and many thousands more. Copyright safe harbor rules empower these platforms by ensuring that they are free to host user-uploaded content, without manually vetting it (or, worse, automatically filtering it) for possible copyright infringements. Without that legal protection, it would be impossible for Continue reading
No word on how many employees were laid off.
Telecom operators need new network monitoring tools. Although mobile core networks are increasingly virtualized—through powerful and flexible technologies such as Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) and Software-Defined Networking (SDN) —network monitoring and analytics functions have only recently started to be virtualized. Stand-alone virtual probes still require mirroring of all the traffic which in turn impacts performance... 
The technology can detect malware in encrypted traffic without decryption.
Some existing licensing models include perpetual, pre-pay, post-pay, pay-per-use, and pay-per-GByte.