5 years with home NAS/RAID
I have lots of data-sets (packet-caps, internet-scans), so I need a large RAID system to hole it all. As I described in 2012, I bought a home "NAS" system. I thought I'd give the 5 year perspective.Reliability. I had two drives fail, which is about to be expected. Buying a new drive, swapping it in, and rebuilding the RAID went painless, though that's because I used RAID6 (two drive redundancy). RAID5 (one drive redundancy) is for chumps.
Speed. I've been unhappy with the speed, but there's not much I can do about it. Mechanical drives access times are slow, and I don't see any way of fixing that.
Cost. It's been $3000 over 5 years (including the two replacement drives). That comes out to $50/month. Amazon's "Glacier" service is $108/month. Since we all have the same hardware costs, it's unlikely that any online cloud storage can do better than doing it yourself.
Moore's Law. For the same price as I spent 5 years ago, I can now get three times the storage, including faster processors in the NAS box. From that perspective, I've only spent $33/month on storage, as the remaining third still has value.
Ease-of-use: The Continue reading
NetApp and Pure Storage are reportedly shopping themselves.
It now runs major OpenStack clouds and works with AWS and Microsoft Azure.
It supports AWS, with Rovius Cloud for Google and Microsoft Azure available later this year.
The move was a first for Microsoft as it grows open source support.
The platform now includes support for Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, IBM Bluemix, and Alibaba Cloud.