A kindly lesson for you non-techies about encryption
The following tweets need to be debunked:The answer to John Schindler's question is:
every expert in cryptography doesn't know thisOh, sure, you can find fringe wacko who also knows crypto that agrees with you but all the sane members of the security community will not.
Telegram is not trustworthy because it's closed-source. We can't see how it works. We don't know if they've made accidental mistakes that can be hacked. We don't know if they've been bribed by the NSA or Russia to put backdoors in their program. In contrast, PGP and Signal are open-source. We can read exactly what the software does. Indeed, thousands of people have been reviewing their software looking for mistakes and backdoors.
Encryption works. Neither the NSA nor the Russians can break properly encrypted content. There's no such thing as "military grade" encryption that is better than consumer grade. There's only encryption that nobody can hack vs. encryption that your neighbor's teenage kid can easily hack. There's essentially nothing in between. Those scenes in TV/movies about breaking encryption is as realistic as sound in space: good for dramatic presentation, but not how things work in the real world.
In particular, end-to-end encryption works. Continue reading

Recent push by Microsoft highlights need to keep container OS platforms tight.
Mellanox and HPE build machine learning data centers; Talari Networks partners with Technology Solutions.
PaaS and IaaS businesses will ‘accelerate into hyper growth’ in 2018, Larry Ellison says.
Moving applications and data to the public cloud brings a number of security advantages.
Download now to learn the latest on container and cloud orchestration.