0
People keep citing
this New York Times article by David Sanger that attributes the DNCleaks to Russia.
As I've written before, this is
propaganda, not journalism. It's against basic journalistic ethics to quote anonymous "federal officials" in a story like this. The Society of Professional Journalists repudiates this
[1] [2]. The NYTime's own ombudsman has itself
criticized David Sanger for this practice, and
written guidelines to specifically ban it.
Quoting anonymous federal officials is great, when they
disagree with government, when revealing government malfeasance, when it's something that people will get fired over.
But the opposite is happening here. It's either Obama himself or some faction within the administration that wants us to believe Russia is involved. They want us to believe the propaganda, then hide behind anonymity so we can't question them. This evades obvious questions, like whether all their information comes from the same public sources that already point to Russia, or whether they have their own information from the CIA or NSA that points to Russia.
Everyone knows the Washington press works this way, and that David Sanger in particular is a journalistic whore. The NetFlix series
House of Cards portrays this accurately in its
Continue reading