Cisco ISR: Enable Features, No Performance Hit?

cisco-logo

Last month I visited Interop NYC 2014 as a guest of Tech Field Day Extra! where our group was given a presentation about the new Cisco ISR routers by Matt Bolick, a Technical Marketing Engineer for Cisco.

The Integrated Service Routers (ISRs) themselves seem pretty feature packed, covering four key areas:

  • Transport independence (DMVPN)
  • Intelligent Path Control (PfR v3)
  • Application Optimization (WAN optimization, ADC and WAAS)
  • Secure Connectivity (Scalable, strong encryption, IPS, web filtering, etc.)

Rather than reinvent the wheel, Matt explained that the idea was to use existing protocols in a useful new way; in this case in particular to offer secure hybrid transport across MPLS and Internet for private cloud and DC access, probably ultimately moving to just Internet connectivity base on the shift Cisco has seen in how corporations see their branch offices (and specifically how much they want to reduce costs!).

So far so cool, but I figure you can look up all the specifications and features for yourselves so I won’t bore you with much more of that here. There was something else that tickled me though.

ISR Performance Figures

The new routers have some interesting performance claims:

Cisco ISR: Enable Features, No Performance Hit?

Last month I visited Interop NYC 2014 as a guest of Tech Field Day Extra! where our group was given a presentation about the new Cisco ISR routers by Matt Bolick, a Technical Marketing Engineer for Cisco. The Integrated Service … Continue reading

If you liked this post, please do click through to the source at Cisco ISR: Enable Features, No Performance Hit? and give me a share/like. Thank you!

4 Inevitable Questions When Joining a Monitoring Group, Pt. 1

Leon Adato, Technical Product Marketing Manager with SolarWinds is our guest blogger today, with a sponsored post on the topic of alerting. The Four Questions For people who are interested in monitoring, there is a leap that you make when you go from watching systems that YOU care about, to monitoring systems that other people […]

Author information

Sponsored Blog Posts

The Packet Pushers work with our vendors to present a limited number of sponsored blog posts to our community. This is one. If you're a vendor and think you have some blog content you'd like to sponsor, contact us via [email protected].

The post 4 Inevitable Questions When Joining a Monitoring Group, Pt. 1 appeared first on Packet Pushers Podcast and was written by Sponsored Blog Posts.

The Roost Stand Discount Code

Original content from Roger's CCIE Blog Tracking the journey towards getting the ultimate Cisco Certification. The Routing & Switching Lab Exam
Since my first post on the Roost Stand I have been overwhelmed with comments on my new portable laptop stand the biggest one is where did you buy it from? The great guys at Roost have given me a Roost Stand Discount Code that you can use at the checkout to get a 10% discount. If... [Read More]

Post taken from CCIE Blog

Original post The Roost Stand Discount Code

iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 11/14/2014

Today was a great week, in our opinion! As Andy is putting up the final touches on his CCIE Collaboration product portfolio, and has a few classes under his belt, we’re beginning to see students pass their Collaboration lab. And of course, Jeff is still cranking out Wireless success stories!

Please Join us in congratulating the following iPexpert clients who have passed their CCIE lab!

  • Rashmi Patel, CCIE #44921 (Collaboration)
  • Jonathan Woloshyn , CCIE #45422 (Collaboration)
  • Istvan Czobor , CCIE #45345 (Wireless)
  • Nitin Chopra , CCIE #45371 (Wireless)

This Week’s CCIE Testimonials

Rashmi Patel, CCIE #44921 Wrote:
“I’d like to thank Andy and iPexpert for their CCIE Collaboration study materials and bootcamp! I used iPexpert’s Ultimate Self-Study Bundle (for the CCIE Collaboration lab). I also attended iPexpert’s 5-Day Bootcamp in Chicago. Andy is a great instructor, he helped me understand the key technical areas within the lab blueprint.”

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s or Proctor Labs self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!

Viptela SEN: Hybrid WAN Connectivity with an SDN Twist

Like many of us Khalid Raza wasted countless hours sitting in meetings discussing hybrid WAN connectivity designs using a random combination of DMVPN, IPsec, PfR, and one or more routing protocols… and decided to try to create a better solution to the problem.

Viptela Secure Extensible Network (SEN) doesn’t try to solve every networking problem ever encountered, which is why it’s simpler to use in the use case it is designed to solve: multi-provider WAN connectivity.

Read more ...

Cumulus in the Campus?

Recently I’ve been idly speculating about how campus networking could be shaken up, with different cost and management models. A few recent podcasts have inspired some thoughts on how Cumulus Networks might fit into this.

In response to a PacketPushers podcast on HP Network Management, featuring yours truly, Kanat asks:

For me the benchmark of network management so far is Meraki Dashboard – stupid simple and feature rich…
Yes – it’s a niche product that only focuses on Campus scenarios, Yes – it only supports proprietary HW. But it offers pretty much everything network operator needs – detailed visibility, traffic policy engine with L7 capability, MDM and you can hit it and go full speed right away.

How long will it take HP to achieve that level of simplicity/usability?

He’s right about the Meraki dashboard. It’s fantastic. Fast to get set up, easy to use, it’s what others should aspire to. But there’s a catch: It only works with Meraki hardware. Keep paying your monthly bills, and all is well. But what if you’ve got non-Meraki hardware? Or what if you decide you don’t want to pay Meraki any more? What if Meraki goes out of business (unlikely, but still Continue reading

Getting started with Cisco ASA

First StepsEven with people who work in networking, as soon as you say the word “firewall” a lot of people tend to stare at that far away place that only exists in their minds. I think some of this comes from the fact that “it’s not a router”. Another reason is that people just haven’t taken the time to get familiar with firewalls. The ASA is Ciscos firewall or VPN device. Though the ASA can do a lot of things, in this post I will cover the basics such as how you set it up and connect the device to the Internet.
Continue reading

Scary Poodle: Quickly Checking Websites for SSLv3

GitHub Logo

Weird looking poodle, right? *coughs* With the recent SSLv3 Poodle vulnerability being disclosed, there has been a rush to disable SSLv3. But if you manage quite a few web sites, how can you quickly check whether or not you are vulnerable? Better still, if you know you have vulnerable sites, wouldn’t it be nice to be able to check before and after your mitigation attempts in order to confirm that SSLv3 has indeed been disabled?

The consequences of disabling SSLv3 is another discussion entirely; let’s assume that I’ve decided it’s worth disabling.

So that was my problem, so here’s what I did about it.

Poodle Poop

What I did was to write a script. In Python.

Regular readers will recall that my “go to” language is Perl, so the fact that I chose to write the tool in Python says, well I don’t know exactly what, but I’m sure it says something. I am not by any means a Python programmer, but I believe I have the tool working, and it’s pleasantly fast. I suspect that the code it won’t look right to a Python programmer, and will look comfortingly uncomfortable to perl programmers. It’s pretty much my first “proper” program Continue reading

Just Published: VXLAN 2.0 Videos

Last week I ran the second part of the updated (4-hour) VXLAN webinar. The raw videos are already online and cover these topics:

  • VXLAN-related technologies, including encapsulation, IP multicast use, unicast VXLAN, and VXLAN-over-EVPN;
  • VXLAN implementations, including Cisco Nexus 1000v, VMware vCNS, VMware NSX, Nuage VSP and Juniper Contrail;
  • VXLAN gateways, including Arista, Brocade, Cisco and Juniper;
  • Hardware VTEP integration with OVSDB and EVPN;
  • VXLAN-based data center fabrics, including Cisco’s ACI.

Network Technology Shifts towards IT’s Third Platform

The requirements for next generation applications in the Third Platform era have a profound impact on the network. No longer can we treat the network as a piece of infrastructure that just needs to be present. It has to drastically change to become a fundamental component of the next generation application. Mike went through some of the network implications of the new era application properties in his post yesterday:

  • Horizontally Scaled
  • Agile
  • Integrated
  • Resilient
  • Secure

The change towards Third Platform IT infrastructures is more than evolutionary. The compute, storage and application frameworks and infrastructures started their transformation a while ago. These types of shifts take time, but networking has not run at the same pace of change to keep up. Up to recently, networking’s great contribution to the changing IT world was a move from a multi tier network into a two tier network with a new name. Hardly transformational to say the least.

Migration and Crossover Technologies

A move towards a new platform does not happen overnight. It takes time and more importantly, it takes several technology iterations to get there. A migration from the current platform requires migration technologies: pieces and parts of what we will ultimately Continue reading

Home Lab Server

Currently I’m doing a lot of testing at home on Network Virtualization solutions, like VMware NSX, Juniper Contrail, etc. Therefore I was stressing my current single home server quite a lot. Which is a custom build Xeon E3-1230 quad core with 32GB of RAM and 128GB SSD. I built this server according to the specifications found at: http://packetpushers.net/vmware-vcdx-lab-the-hardware/ . This has been a great investment as I’m running nested virtualization for both KVM and ESXi hypervisors and run the testing in there. Due to the fact that for a decent Network Virtualization (NV) set-up you need quite some memory, especially if you look at the memory utilisation of the NV Controller VMs, I had to expand my lab. I chose to extend it with an additional server so I would be physically redundant as well, making it easier to run upgrades on the physical machines.

Requirements

My requirements aren’t difficult as I mainly perform feature testing in my lab I don’t need a lot of CPU performance. There are no “Production” VMs running, everything is there to play around, so downtime is not a problem if necessary.
Other requirements:

  • Average CPU performance
  • Nested virtualization support
  • At least 32GB of Continue reading

Accelerating Open vSwitch to “Ludicrous Speed”

[This post was written by OVS core contributors Justin Pettit, Ben Pfaff, and Ethan Jackson.]

The overhead associated with vSwitches has been a hotly debated topic in the networking community. In this blog post, we show how recent changes to OVS have elevated its performance to be on par with the native Linux bridge. Furthermore, CPU utilization of OVS in realistic scenarios can be up to 8x below that of the Linux bridge.  This is the first of a two-part series.  In the next post, we take a peek at the design and performance of the forthcoming port to DPDK, which bypasses the kernel entirely to gain impressive performance.

Open vSwitch is the most popular network back-end for OpenStack deployments and widely accepted as the de facto standard OpenFlow implementation.  Open vSwitch development initially had a narrow focus — supporting novel features necessary for advanced applications such as network virtualization.  However, as we gained experience with production deployments, it became clear these initial goals were not sufficient.  For Open vSwitch to be successful, it not only must be highly programmable and general, it must also be blazingly fast.  For the past several years, our development efforts have focused on Continue reading

Accurate Dependency Mapping – One Day?

Recently I’ve been thinking about Root Cause Analysis (RCA), and how it’s not perfect, but there may be hope for the future.

The challenge is that Automated RCA needs an accurate, complete picture of how everything connects together to work well. You need to know all the dependencies between networks, storage, servers, applications, etc. If you have a full dependency mapping, you can start to figure out what the underlying cause of a fault is, or you can start doing ‘What If?’ scenario planning.

But once your network gets past a moderate size, it’s hard to maintain this sort of dependency mapping. Manual methods break down, and we look for automated means instead – but they have gaps and limitations.

Automated Mapping – Approaches & Limitations

Tools such as HP’s CMS suite attempt to discover all objects and dependencies using a combination of network scanning and agents. They’ll use things like ping, SNMP, WMI, nmap to identify systems and running services. Agents can then report more data about installed applications, configurations, etc.

Network sniffing can also be used to identify traffic flows. Most tools will also connect to common orchestration points, such as vCenter, or the AWS console, to Continue reading

Ansible Tower Webinar

webinar

We have an Ansible Tower webinar scheduled for next week.

This webinar will provide an example of how Ansible Tower allows you to centralize your Ansible infrastructure from a modern UI, featuring role-based access control, job scheduling, and graphical inventory management. Tower's REST API and CLI make it easy to embed Tower into existing tools and processes.

Tower now includes real-time output of playbook runs, an all-new dashboard and expanded out-of-the-box cloud support. 

Sign-up today

Ansible Tower Demo - 11/19 2:30 PM EST

Does the Internet need “Governance”?

Dave Reed just published concerning network neutrality. Everyone interested in the topic should  carefully read and understand  Does the Internet need “Governance”?

One additional example of “light touch” help for the Internet where government may play a role is transparency: the recent MLAB’s report and the fact that Cogent’s actions caused retail ISP’s to look very badly is a case in point. You can follow up on that topic on the MLabs’s mailing list, if you are so inclined. If a carrier can arbitrarily delay/deprioritize traffic in secret, then the market (as there are usually alternatives in transit providers) cannot function well. And if that provider is an effective monopoly for many paths, that becomes a huge problem.