How Observability Is Different for Web3 Apps

Web3 represents the next evolutionary step in building web applications. Web3 combines blockchain technology, decentralized protocols and peer-to-peer interactions to give birth to a new standard for transparency and security through decentralized applications (dApps). The dApps rely on decentralized servers instead of traditional (Web2) applications based on a centralized server. However, this new paradigm presents challenges for logging, tracing — in a Django-based Web3 application using Scout APM. How Is Observability Different in Decentralized Apps? Observability in Web3 dApps poses several unique challenges that need to be resolved. Immutable Transactions Web3 dApps rely heavily on blockchain technology. Generally speaking, once a blockchain transaction has been confirmed, it cannot be changed, even if there has been a mistake. This makes it extremely important to have close monitoring and observability to detect and prevent issues before data is written to the blockchain. Distributed Data Traditional web applications rely on centralized servers while Web3 dApps rely on a globally distributed and decentralized network of nodes. A robust observability solution is therefore required to aggregate and analyze data across this complex network. Variable Continue reading

Technology Short Take 176

Welcome to Technology Short Take #176! This Tech Short Take is a bit heavy on security-related links, but there’s still some additional content in a number of other areas, so you should be able to find something useful—or at least interesting—in here. Thanks for reading!

Networking

Servers/Hardware

Security

  • In early February a vulnerability was uncovered in a key component of the Linux boot process. The vulnerability affects virtually all Linux distributions and allows attackers to bypass the secure boot protections and insert a low-level bootkit. While the requirements for exploiting the vulnerability Continue reading

Video: Intro to Real Life Network Automation

Urs Baumann invited me to have a guest lecture in his network automation course, and so I had the privilege of being in lovely Rapperswil last week, talking about the basics of real-life network automation.

Urs published the video recording of the presentation on YouTube; hope you’ll like it, and if you don’t get too annoyed by the overly pushy ads, watch the other videos from his infrastructure-as-code course.

History of SDN in Google’s datacentre

I recently read a very interesting post on LinkedIn in which Urs Hölzle, one of the original Google network engineers, celebrated twenty years of Google network innovation. He provided links to the recent paper from Google describing how Google developed its datacentre network and how it has evolved since then. The paper describes how Google applied the Clos network topology in its datacentres and the early implementations of software-defined-networking that controlled data flows across the network.

One point that was really interesting, which came up in the comments to the article, is that Google implemented the original network routing code in Python.

Mr. Hölzle also linked to an independant research report that came out at the time. It provided the initial view of what Google was developing and is interesting to read almost 20 years after it was written.

The post History of SDN in Google’s datacentre appeared first on Open-Source Routing and Network Simulation.

Data Center Fabric Designs: Size Matters

The “should we use the same vendor for fabric spines and leaves?” discussion triggered the expected counterexamples. Here’s one:

I actually have worked with a few orgs that mix vendors at both spine and leaf layer. Can’t take names but they run fairly large streaming services. To me it seems like a play to avoid vendor lock-in, drive price points down and be in front of supply chain issues.

As always, one has to keep two things in mind:

Read more …

BGP AS Numbers for a Private MPLS/VPN Backbone

One of my readers was building a private MPLS/VPN backbone and wondered whether they should use their public AS number or a private AS number for the backbone. Usually, it doesn’t matter; the deciding point was the way they want to connect to the public Internet:

We also plan to peer with multiple external ISPs to advertise our public IP space not directly from our PE routers but from dedicated Internet Routers, adding a firewall between our PEs and external Internet routers.

They could either run BGP between the PE routers, firewall, and WAN routers (see BGP as High-Availability Protocol for more details) or run BGP across a bump-in-the-wire firewall:

Read more …

The Cloud Outgrows Linux, And Sparks A New Operating System

Ultimately, every problem in the constantly evolving IT software stack becomes a database problem, which is why there are 418 different databases and datastores in the DB Engines rankings and there are really only a handful of commercially viable operating systems. …

The Cloud Outgrows Linux, And Sparks A New Operating System was written by Timothy Prickett Morgan at The Next Platform.

Adding TS’s IP Address to MAC-VRF (L2RIB) and IP-VRF (L3RIB)

In the previous chapter, we discussed how a VTEP learns the local TS's MAC address and the process through which the MAC address is programmed into BGP tables. An example VTEP device was configured with a Layer 2 VLAN and an EVPN Instance without deploying a VRF Context or VLAN routing interface. This chapter introduces, at a theoretical level, how the VTEP device, besides the TS's MAC address, learns the TS's IP address information after we have configured the VRF Context and routing interface for our example VLAN.


Figure 1-3: MAC-VRF Tenant System’s IP Address Propagation.

I have divided Figure 1-3 into three sections. The section on the top left, Integrated Routing and Bridging - IRB illustrates the components required for intra-tenant routing and their interdependencies. By configuring a Virtual Routing and Forwarding Context (VRF Context), we create a closed routing environment with a per-tenant IP-VRF L3 Routing Information Base (L3RIB). Within the VRF Context, we define the Layer 3 Virtual Network Identifier (L3VNI) along with the Route Distinguisher (RD) and Route Target (RT) values. The RD of the VRF Context enables the use of overlapping IP addresses across different tenants. Based on the RT value of the VRF Context, Continue reading

OSPF Summarization and Split Areas

In the Do We Still Need OSPF Areas and Summarization? I wrote this somewhat cryptic remark:

The routers advertising a summarized prefix should be connected by a path going exclusively through the part of the network with more specific prefixes. GRE tunnel also satisfies that criteria; the proof is left as an exercise for the reader.

One of my readers asked for a lengthier explanation, so here we go. Imagine a network with two areas doing inter-area summarization on /24 boundary:

Read more …
1 … 61 62 63 64 65 … 3,698