HW030: Down and Dirty with Industrial Wireless

Kubernetes network policies: 4 pain points and how to address them

Kubernetes is used everywhere, from test environments to the most critical production foundations that we use daily, making it undoubtedly a de facto in cloud computing. While this is great news for everyone who works with, administers, and expands Kubernetes, the downside is that it makes Kubernetes a favorable target for malicious actors.

Malicious actors typically exploit flaws in the system to gain access to a portion of the environment. They then chain these flaws together to move laterally within the environment, ultimately seeking root access or access to critical information.

While the best way to fix security flaws in any software is to patch it with appropriate fixes that the project maintainers publish, there are certain security practices that you can adopt to fortify your environment, like using network policies. However, most people find network policies complex and overwhelming, which discourages them from implementing policies in their environment.

In this blog post, we will examine four pain points that people face when they want to implement network policies and provide solutions to help you effectively secure your Kubernetes environment.

What is a network policy and why should I use it?

In Kubernetes, a network policy (KNP) resource is the Continue reading

HS076: Greg’s Finale

How to Achieve Ultimate Freedom with Your Load Balancer

The popularity of open source software continues to soar alongside growth in cloud usage, including multicloud and hybrid cloud infrastructure. Pluralsight’s State of Cloud 2023 report revealed that

Running BGP Labs in GitHub Codespaces

I love open-source tools (and their GitHub repositories). Someone launches a cool idea, and you can dig through their source code to figure out how it works. It beats reading documentation or fixing AI hallucinations every day of the week ;)

Not too long ago, the containerlab team launched the ability to run containerlab within a free¹ container² running on GitHub, and that seemed like a perfect solution to run the BGP labs (Jeroen van Bemmel pointing me in the right direction was another significant step forward).

Running BGP Labs in GitHub Codespaces

I love open-source tools (and their GitHub repositories). Someone launches a cool idea, and you can dig through their source code to figure out how it works. It beats reading documentation or fixing AI hallucinations every day of the week ;)

Not too long ago, the containerlab team launched the ability to run containerlab within a free¹ container² running on GitHub, and that seemed like a perfect solution to run the BGP labs (Jeroen van Bemmel pointing me in the right direction was another significant step forward).

Why Didn’t We Have Anycast Gateways Before VXLAN?

A while back I started thinking about why it took so long before we started using anycast gateways. I started thinking about what would be the reason(s) for not doing it earlier. I came up with some good reasons and it started making sense to me. I then asked you all what your thoughts were and received a ton of great responses. Here are a few that were mentioned:

• It was a natural evolution.
• More powerful devices.
• We didn’t have overlays.
• There were no protocols to map what device a MAC sits behind.
• Reusing the same IP would cause IP conflicts.

These are all certainly true to some degree. I would argue though that the main reason why we didn’t have it earlier is because of the topology and protocols we used in traditional LANs. The typical design was to have three layers, access, distribution, and core. The links in access to distribution layer were L2 only and the distribution layer had all the L3 configuration. A typical topology looked like this:

In a topology like this, there are only two devices that host the L3 configuration needed for hosts. When you have two of something, it’s natural to think Continue reading

NB484: HPE, Nvidia Cozy Up on AI Infrastructure; Norway Uncovers Rare Earth Elements Motherlode

Tech Bytes: Performance, Power Efficiency Drive Dutch IXP Upgrade to Nokia Routers, Silicon (Sponsored)

The Appetite For Datacenter Compute Is Ravenous

It has been an invaluable asset for AMD as it re-engaged in the datacenter in the past decade to have Forrest Norrod as the general manager of its datacenter business. …

The Appetite For Datacenter Compute Is Ravenous was written by Timothy Prickett Morgan at The Next Platform.

Helping keep customers safe with leaked password notification

Password reuse is a real problem. When people use the same password across multiple services, it creates a risk that a breach of one service will give attackers access to a different, apparently unrelated, service. Attackers know people reuse passwords and build giant lists of known passwords and known usernames or email addresses.

If you got to the end of that paragraph and realized you’ve reused the same password multiple places, stop reading and go change those passwords. We’ll wait.

To help protect Cloudflare customers who have used a password attackers know about, we are releasing a feature to improve the security of the Cloudflare dashboard for all our customers by automatically checking whether their Cloudflare user password has appeared in an attacker's list. Cloudflare will securely check a customer’s password against threat intelligence sources that monitor data breaches in other services.

If a customer logs in to Cloudflare with a password that was leaked in a breach elsewhere on the Internet, Cloudflare will alert them and ask them to choose a new password.

For some customers, the news that their password was known to hackers will come as a surprise – no one wants to intentionally use passwords that Continue reading

MikroTik ROSv7 Cheat Sheets – OSPFv2/v3 standard area LSA propagation.

When learning how to use OSPF with MikroTik, it can sometimes be difficult to understand how the different LSA types flow between areas.

In MikroTik’s OSPF documentation they briefly cover the LSA for OSPFv2 but don’t have OSPFv3 listed yet.

To better illustrate how the LSAs work, I created these graphical overviews for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3. When troubleshooting OSPF, it’s very helpful to understand which LSAs you should see in an area and how IPv4 and IPv6 differ.

Hope you find these helpful!

OSPFv2

PDF: https://stubarea51.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/ROSv7-OSPF-Fundamentals-SA51-OSPFv2-Default-Area.pdf

OSPFv3

PDF: https://stubarea51.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/ROSv7-OSPF-Fundamentals-SA51-OSPFv3-Default-Area.pdf

Using machine learning to detect bot attacks that leverage residential proxies

Bots using residential proxies are a major source of frustration for security engineers trying to fight online abuse. These engineers often see a similar pattern of abuse when well-funded, modern botnets target their applications. Advanced bots bypass country blocks, ASN blocks, and rate-limiting. Every time, the bot operator moves to a new IP address space until they blend in perfectly with the “good” traffic, mimicking real users’ behavior and request patterns. Our new Bot Management machine learning model (v8) identifies residential proxy abuse without resorting to IP blocking, which can cause false positives for legitimate users.  

Background

One of the main sources of Cloudflare’s bot score is our bot detection machine learning model which analyzes, on average, over 46 million HTTP requests per second in real time. Since our first Bot Management ML model was released in 2019, we have continuously evolved and improved the model. Nowadays, our models leverage features based on request fingerprints, behavioral signals, and global statistics and trends that we see across our network.

Each iteration of the model focuses on certain areas of improvement. This process starts with a rigorous R&D phase to identify the emerging patterns of bot attacks by reviewing feedback from Continue reading

netlab 1.8.4: vrnetlab Containers, Catalyst 8000v

I don’t think I ever created two netlab releases in a week, but last week, I stumbled upon a motherlode of goodies, and it would be a shame not to make them available.

Someone tried to use netlab with vrnetlab containers for CSR 1000v and Nexus 9300v. We got it to work, but when I started integrating his changes into the development branch, I wanted to test them, so I installed vrnetlab to create my own container images. vrnetlab is an excellent tool, and building containers is a breeze (running them is a different story), so I added support for vrnetlab containers for every device supported by that tool and netlab for which I happened to have a disk image.

netlab 1.8.4: vrnetlab Containers, Catalyst 8000v

I don’t think I ever created two netlab releases in a week, but last week, I stumbled upon a motherlode of goodies, and it would be a shame not to make them available.

Someone tried to use netlab with vrnetlab containers for CSR 1000v and Nexus 9300v. We got it to work, but when I started integrating his changes into the development branch, I wanted to test them, so I installed vrnetlab to create my own container images. vrnetlab is an excellent tool, and building containers is a breeze (running them is a different story), so I added support for vrnetlab containers for every device supported by that tool and netlab for which I happened to have a disk image.

Why content providers need IPv6

IPv4 is an expensive resource. However, many content providers are still IPv4-only. The most common reason is that IPv4 is here to stay and IPv6 is an additional complexity.¹ This mindset may seem selfish, but there are compelling reasons for a content provider to enable IPv6, even when they have enough IPv4 addresses available for their needs.

Why ISPs need IPv6?​

Providing a public IPv4 address to each customer is quite costly when each IP address costs US$40 on the market. For fixed access, some consumer ISPs are still providing one IPv4 address per customer.² Other ISPs provide, by default, an IPv4 address shared among several customers. For mobile access, most ISPs distribute a shared IPv4 address.

There are several methods to share an IPv4 address:³

NAT44

The customer device is given a private IPv4 address, which is translated to a public one by a service provider device. This device needs to maintain a state for each translation.

464XLAT Continue reading

Is your TLS resuming?

There are two main ways that a TLS handshake can go: Full handshake, or resume.

There are two benefits to resumption:

1. it can save a round trip between the client and server.
2. it saves CPU cost of a public key operation.

Round trip

Saving a round trip is important for latency. Some websites don’t use a CDN, so a roundtrip could take a while. And even those on a CDN can be tens of milliseconds away. Maybe won’t matter much for a human, but roundtrips can kill the performance of something that needs to do sequential connections.

E.g. Australia is far away:

$ ping -c 1 -n www.treasury.gov.au
PING treasury.gov.au (3.104.80.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 3.104.80.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=39 time=369 ms

That’s about a third of a second. Certainly noticeable to a human. Especially since rendering a web page usually requires many connections to different hosts.

For TCP based web requests (in other words: not QUIC), there’s usually four roundtrips involved (slightly simplified):

1. TCP connection establishment.
2. ClientHello & ServerHello.
3. Client & Server ChangeCipherSpec.
4. HTTP request & response.

So from the UK to Australia, that’s about Continue reading

Arista Network Test Automation (ANTA) Example

When I was at Autocon1, I visited the Arista booth and had an interesting chat with their team. They mentioned a tool called Arista Network Test Automation (ANTA), which sounded promising, and I wanted to try it out in my lab. As with anything related to automation, I always want to experiment and share my findings with my readers.

What is ANTA?

In a nutshell, if you work with Arista devices, you can use the ANTA Python library to write tests using a simple YAML declarative syntax. From a very high level, you define some tests, run them, and they either pass or fail. This straightforward approach helps you quickly verify the health and configuration of your network.

Here are some of the tests you can write.

• Checking if all your EOS devices are running a specific EOS version,
• Ensuring all BGP peers are up and running
• Verifying if you have a specific route on all or specific devices
• Verify PortChannels and Interfaces
• And many more

Here is a very simple test that checks if all my routers (6 in total) have the specified two routes in their routing tables. The test will fail if the route doesn't Continue reading

VPP with loopback-only OSPFv3 – Part 2

Introduction

When I first built IPng Networks AS8298, I decided to use OSPF as an IPv4 and IPv6 internal gateway protocol. Back in March I took a look at two slightly different ways of doing this for IPng, notably against a backdrop of conserving IPv4 addresses. As the network grows, the little point to point transit networks between routers really start adding up.

I explored two potential solutions to this problem:

1. [Babel] can use IPv6 nexthops for IPv4 destinations - which is super useful because it would allow me to retire all of the IPv4 /31 point to point networks between my routers.
2. [OSPFv3] makes it difficult to use IPv6 nexthops for IPv4 destinations, but in a discussion with the Bird Users mailinglist, we found a way: by reusing a single IPv4 loopback address on adjacent interfaces

In May I ran a modest set of two canaries, one between the two routers in my house (chbtl0 and chbtl1), and another between a router at the Daedalean colocation and Interxion datacenters (ddln0 and chgtg0). AS8298 has about quarter of a /24 tied up in these otherwise pointless point-to-point transit networks (see what Continue reading

Oracle OCI DRCC – Who, What, How? Regional Subnet – Happiness

Disclaimer: All writings and opinions are my own and are interpreted solely from my understanding. Please contact the concerned support teams for a professional opinion, as technology and features change rapidly.

Topics Discussed: DRCCs Intro and OCI Cloud Regional Subnet

Spoiler alert: This involves an on-premises cloud for customers offered by Oracle. All offerings for cloud@customer by Oracle can be viewed at https://www.oracle.com/cloud/cloud-at-customer/

Dedicate Region Cloud @Customer – DRCC

Ref: https://www.oracle.com/cloud/cloud-at-customer/dedicated-region/#rc30category-documentation

Before understanding DRCC, let’s consider the scope of improvement on customer premises with their own Data Center and what it tries to solve. Fair? Let’s imagine I have my own data centre. Great! My infrastructure supports some of my workloads, but how do I get the latest technology stack, support, and services that the public cloud offers?

For example, how can someone leverage all these services without having to invest in development cycles yet meet latency/integration/data security and multiple other requirements?

Ref: https://www.oracle.com/cloud/