
Wireless isn’t easy by any stretch of the imagination. Most people fixate on the spectrum analysis part of the equation when they think about how hard wireless is. But there are many other moving parts in the whole architecture that make it difficult to manage and maintain. Not the least of which is how the devices talk to each other.
This week at Aruba Atmosphere 2019, I had the opportunity to moderate a panel of wireless and security experts for Mobility Field Day Exclusive. It was a fun discussion, as you can see from the above video. As the moderator, I didn’t really get a change to explain my thoughts on OpenConfig, but I figured now would be a great time to jump in with some color on my side of the conversation.
One of the most exciting ideas behind OpenConfig for wireless people should be the common YANG data models. This means that you can use NETCONF to have a common programming language against specific YANG models. That means no more fumbling around to remember esoteric commands. You just tell the system what you want it to do and the rest is easy.
As outlined Continue reading
The operator contributed the initial seed code for the 5G RAN Intelligent Controller, which was...
A while ago I made a statement along the lines of “MPLS segment routing is the best thing that happened to MPLS control plane in a decade”. Obviously some MPLS-focused engineers disagree with that and a few years ago I decided to write a lengthy blog post explaining the differences between using MPLS SR with IGP (or BGP) versus more traditional IGP+LDP approach.
Obviously, I wasn’t making any progress on that front, so the only way forward was to record a short video on the topic which didn’t work well either because the end-result was a set of three videos (available with free or paid ipSpace.net subscription).
What is dynamic routing? Why is Routing Information Protocol (RIP) horrible, and Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) ever so slightly less horrible? How does Linux handle OSPF, and what advantages does it bring over traditional networking gear in complex, intent-based, infrastructure-as-code environments?
RIP and OSPF are Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs). IGPs are protocols designed to allow network routers and switches within an organization’s internal network to dynamically reconfigure the network to respond to changes. These changes may include the addition or removal of network equipment or network links between network devices.
The purpose of IGPs is to tell networking equipment which devices live where. While devices that are part of the same subnet can find one another, they require a router to communicate with devices on other subnets. Routers and switches keep routing tables of which devices are on which physical interface, and VLAN. These routing tables allow each device to know where to send a packet to reach a given system, and whether or not that packet needs to be encapsulated or tagged.
IGPs allow routers and switches to exchange some or all of their routing tables so that other devices within the network fabric know where to send Continue reading
This is the first PoC for the provider's newest portfolio addition, which provides SD-WAN and...
The Spanish operator is also said to be finalizing a pact with rival Vodafone Spain to share parts...
Who's the wicked queen in the data center switch merchant silicon business?
The post 50 Things – Improving DC Fabric BGP Convergence appeared first on Network Collective.
The post 50 Things – Link State Data Center Fabrics appeared first on Network Collective.
The post Design Series – Link State Flooding Domains appeared first on Network Collective.
The post 50 Things – More DNS (DNSSEC and PTR) appeared first on Network Collective.
The post 50 Things – IPv4 Packet Walkthrough appeared first on Network Collective.
The post Communication Series – Writing Style appeared first on Network Collective.
The post 50 Things – Understanding The Routing Table appeared first on Network Collective.
State and regional IPv6 task forces advocate for IPv6 adoption by state governments and the private sector, and educate engineers. In today's episode we chat with George Usi, the Co-Chair of the California IPv6 Task Force to learn more about the task force's goals and what it's achieved to date.
The post IPv6 Buzz 023: How State Task Forces Drive IPv6 Adoption appeared first on Packet Pushers.