We’ll be at NANOG 73 in Denver, CO, USA this week talking about routing security, MANRS, and IPv6.
The North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) is the professional association for Internet engineering, architecture and operations. Its core focus is on continuous improvement of the data transmission technologies, practices, and facilities that make the Internet function. NANOG meetings are among the largest in the region, bringing together top technologists on a wide range of topics.
On Tuesday, 26 June, at 1:30PM, Andrei Robachevsky will give a talk called, “Routing Is At Risk. Let’s Secure It Together.”
From the session abstract:
“Stolen cryptocurrency, hijacked traffic blocking access to whole countries, derailing vital Web resources for thousands of people. Routing used to fly under the radar. As long as incidents weren’t too bad, no one asked too many questions, and routing security never made it to the top of the to-do list. But these days, routing incidents are regularly making the news, executives are getting nervous, and engineers are under pressure to make sure their network isn’t next. The problem is, you cannot secure your own network entirely by yourself. But you can help secure the global routing system Continue reading
Routing information protocol (RIP) is a interior distance vector routing protocol originally defined in RFC1058. RIP has had a number of improvements over the years with version 2 being defined RFC2453 and RIPng adding IPv6 support in RFC2080. Transport RIPv1 and RIPv2...continue reading
I have spent some time studying the CCDE materials. One broken design example that has come up involves route reflector clients that don’t align with the physical topology. This article examines that example and some solutions to the problem.
To illustrate this example we have built the topology below. I used loopback addresses 1.1.1.1 through 6.6.6.6 (based on csr1000v-x). The router on the top is a eBGP neighbor with csr1000v-1 and csr1000v-2. The four routers forming a square in the center have an initial configuration of OSFP and BGP (iBGP as shown). Both Route Reflectors are peered with both clients.
//csr1000v-2 shown, csr1000v-3 similar router ospf 1 router-id 2.2.2.2 passive-interface GigabitEthernet2 network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 router bgp 64513 bgp router-id 2.2.2.2 bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 64513 neighbor 3.3.3.3 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 4.4.4.4 remote-as 64513 neighbor 4.4.4.4 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 4.4.4.4 route-reflector-client neighbor 5.5.5.5 remote-as 64513 Continue reading
I have spent some time studying the CCDE materials. One broken design example that has come up involves route reflector clients that don’t align with the physical topology. This article examines that example and some solutions to the problem.
To illustrate this example we have built the topology below. I used loopback addresses 1.1.1.1 through 6.6.6.6 (based on csr1000v-x). The router on the top is a eBGP neighbor with csr1000v-1 and csr1000v-2. The four routers forming a square in the center have an initial configuration of OSFP and BGP (iBGP as shown). Both Route Reflectors are peered with both clients.
//csr1000v-2 shown, csr1000v-3 similar router ospf 1 router-id 2.2.2.2 passive-interface GigabitEthernet2 network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 router bgp 64513 bgp router-id 2.2.2.2 bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 64513 neighbor 3.3.3.3 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 4.4.4.4 remote-as 64513 neighbor 4.4.4.4 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 4.4.4.4 route-reflector-client neighbor 5.5.5.5 remote-as 64513 Continue reading
I have spent some time studying the CCDE materials. One broken design example that has come up involves route reflector clients that don’t align with the physical topology. This article examines that example and some solutions to the problem.
To illustrate this example we have built the topology below. I used loopback addresses 1.1.1.1 through 6.6.6.6 (based on csr1000v-x). The router on the top is a eBGP neighbor with csr1000v-1 and csr1000v-2. The four routers forming a square in the center have an initial configuration of OSFP and BGP (iBGP as shown). Both Route Reflectors are peered with both clients.
//csr1000v-2 shown, csr1000v-3 similar router ospf 1 router-id 2.2.2.2 passive-interface GigabitEthernet2 network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 router bgp 64513 bgp router-id 2.2.2.2 bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 64513 neighbor 3.3.3.3 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 4.4.4.4 remote-as 64513 neighbor 4.4.4.4 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 4.4.4.4 route-reflector-client neighbor 5.5.5.5 remote-as 64513 Continue reading
Developer concern over Microsoft's $7.5 billion acquisition of GitHub could provide a long-term opportunity in the open source Git repository community.
With the DNSSEC Root Key Rollover coming up on October 11, how prepared are we as an industry? What kind of data can we collect in preparation? What is the cost benefit (or not) of implementing DANE? What can we learn from an existing rollover of a cryptographic algorithm?
All those questions and more will be discussed at the DNSSEC Workshop at the ICANN 62 meeting in Panama City, Panama, on Monday, June 25, 2018. The session will begin at 9:00 and conclude at 12:15 EST (UTC-5). [Note: this is one hour different than current US Eastern Daylight Time – Panama does not change to daylight savings time – and so this will begin at 10:00 EDT (UTC-4).]
The agenda includes:
It should be an outstanding session! For those onsite, the workshop will be in Salon 4, the ccNSO room.
Dubbed Lazy FP State Restore, the vulnerability (CVE-2018-3665) within Intel Core and Xeon processors has just been confirmed by Intel, and vendors are now rushing to roll out security updates in order to fix the flaw and keep their customers protected. The company has not yet released technical details about the vulnerability, but since the vulnerability resides in the CPU, the flaw affects all devices running Intel Core-based microprocessors regardless of the installed operating systems, except some modern versions of Continue reading
International Speedway Corporation needed its applications to run as fast as the race cars on its tracks.
T-Mobile’s acquisition of Sprint will mean a larger 5G footprint and a higher capacity network, says Sprint’s CTO.
The company's stock plunged as much as 13 percent early Friday having just hit a new 52-week high last week.
ZTE stock sinks after U.S. Senate bill; T-Mobile and Sprint advance their proposed merger; and VMware works with the U.S. government and public sector.
In this episode, the Packet Pushers dive into optical networking. Optical networking tends to be a specialized area of networking. It’s much less about packets and paths and more about physical properties of fiber optic cables, signal propagation, and remote operations.
In recent times, optical companies have been moving into Data Center Interconnect (DCI) and selling direct to enterprises using dark fiber as well as offering DCI services via infrastructure suppliers.
Joining us today to offer their expertise on optical are Scott Wilkinson, Senior Director, Portfolio Marketing at ECI Telecom; and Andrew Schmitt, founder of Cignal AI.
We discuss the basics of silicon photonics and how it impacts optical networking, particularly for DCI. We also examine the open optical movement being driven by the Facebook-backed Telecom Infrastructure Project.
Cignal AI Newsletter sign-up – Cignal AI
IP and Optical integration white paper – ECI Telecom (PDF)
ONF s ODTN Project Brings Disaggregation and Open Source to Optical Networking – Open Networking.org
Infinera – Following the Open Road(map) – YouTube
Download an overview of latest news from last big optical conference – OFC2018
Pulse-amplitude modulation – Wikipedia
Quadrature amplitude modulation – Wikipedia
In this Short Take, Eyvonne explores how to think about your career trajectory and covers 5 questions you should ask yourself when planning your career.
The post Short Take – Thinking About Your Career Trajectory appeared first on Network Collective.
Only 1 in 10 Wikipedia editors is a woman. Unfortunately, the underrepresentation of female perspectives is quite common within the tech world. In order to help achieve gender equality in content creation and dissemination, Wikipedia Editathons are held as a way of bridging the gap and encourage female editors to increase the coverage of women’s topics.
The Internet Society India Delhi Chapter, in partnership with the Women Special Interest Group and supported by the Wikimedia Foundation, organized the 1st Global Editathon “Girls in ICT” on 28 April, 2018. Various Chapters and groups participated in this event to increase Wikipedia pages about Asian women who have contributed to any technology-related fields.
“Women are seriously underrepresented in Wikipedia’s content,” says Amrita Choudhury, treasurer of the Internet Society India Delhi Chapter. She has over 17 years of experience in IT and the Internet industry and is a member of the SIG Women team. “Exact figures vary depending on which research you’re reading, but only around 17% of individuals profiled on Wikipedia are women.”
What Chapters were involved and how did you work together?
“As devoted to the #ShineTheLight movement, we decided to collaborate with the SIG Women, whose main interest Continue reading