Arista Networks Enters Campus Switching Market
Arista is also working with HPE’s Aruba and VMware as part of its foray into the campus. This is an area where Cisco dominates.
16 Blockchain Disruptions
I am more than happy to publish the new infographic "16 Blockchain Disruptions" with the help of my friends from bitfortune.net. As we know, blockchain enables decentralized transactions across a P2P network. The infographic lists 16 different industries that benefits from using the blockchain technology. Enjoy reading.
16 Blockchain Disruptions
I am more than happy to publish the new infographic "16 Blockchain Disruptions" with the help of my friends from bitfortune.net. As we know, blockchain enables decentralized transactions across a P2P network. The infographic lists 16 different industries that benefits from using the blockchain technology. Enjoy reading.
Quick Take On Arista’s ‘Cognitive Cloud Networking For The Campus’ Announcement
As predicted, Arista starts work on the Campus.Data Center Design: Installing a Modern Network
In this excerpt from "Building Modern Networks," learn how to determine equipment requirements for a data center network.
Please don’t register to South Africa/Johannesburg CCDE Class, it is full !
Hi Everyone, I would like to inform you that Instructor Led CCDE Class in South Africa/Johannesburg Training is full. So please don’t register for it. Having more people will reduce the time required for discussions. Those who attended any of my earlier class know that we have already very packed agenda, approximately 2000 […]
The post Please don’t register to South Africa/Johannesburg CCDE Class, it is full ! appeared first on Cisco Network Design and Architecture | CCDE Bootcamp | orhanergun.net.
Please don’t register to South Africa/Johannesburg CCDE Class, it is full !
Hi Everyone, I would like to inform you that Instructor Led CCDE Class in South Africa/Johannesburg Training is full. So please don’t register for it. Having more people will reduce the time required for discussions. Those who attended any of my earlier class know that we have already very packed agenda, approximately 2000 …
Continue reading "Please don’t register to South Africa/Johannesburg CCDE Class, it is full !"
The post Please don’t register to South Africa/Johannesburg CCDE Class, it is full ! appeared first on Cisco Network Design and Architecture | CCDE Bootcamp | orhanergun.net.
Please don’t register to South Africa/Johannesburg CCDE Class, it is full !
Hi Everyone, I would like to inform you that Instructor Led CCDE Class in South Africa/Johannesburg Training is full. So please don’t register for it. Having more people will reduce the time required for discussions. Those who attended any of my earlier class know that we have already very packed agenda, approximately 2000 …
Continue reading "Please don’t register to South Africa/Johannesburg CCDE Class, it is full !"
The post Please don’t register to South Africa/Johannesburg CCDE Class, it is full ! appeared first on Cisco Network Design and Architecture | CCDE Bootcamp | orhanergun.net.
Different IGP and BGP Methodologies of Multi National Service Providers
Different IGP and BGP Methodologies of Multi National Service Providers. I mentioned two different IGP and BGP design approaches for two different Multi National Service Providers in my last CCDE course Both are these operators in Africa and one of them has an operation in 4 and another has an operation in 5 countries. […]
The post Different IGP and BGP Methodologies of Multi National Service Providers appeared first on Cisco Network Design and Architecture | CCDE Bootcamp | orhanergun.net.
Different IGP and BGP Methodologies of Multi National Service Providers
Different IGP and BGP Methodologies of Multi National Service Providers. I mentioned two different IGP and BGP design approaches for two different Multi National Service Providers in my last CCDE course Both are these operators in Africa and one of them has an operation in 4 and another has an operation in 5 countries. …
Continue reading "Different IGP and BGP Methodologies of Multi National Service Providers"
The post Different IGP and BGP Methodologies of Multi National Service Providers appeared first on Cisco Network Design and Architecture | CCDE Bootcamp | orhanergun.net.
Different IGP and BGP Methodologies of Multi National Service Providers
Different IGP and BGP Methodologies of Multi National Service Providers. I mentioned two different IGP and BGP design approaches for two different Multi National Service Providers in my last CCDE course Both are these operators in Africa and one of them has an operation in 4 and another has an operation in 5 countries. …
Continue reading "Different IGP and BGP Methodologies of Multi National Service Providers"
The post Different IGP and BGP Methodologies of Multi National Service Providers appeared first on Cisco Network Design and Architecture | CCDE Bootcamp | orhanergun.net.
The Difference between Hodgepodge PoC and Production
A friend of mine who had the unfortunate “pleasure” of being exposed to one of the open-source controller platforms sent me this after reading my snarky take on bragging about what you’re doing at Something-Open-Something-Something conferences.
Read more ...Validating SGT Inline with Netflow and Embedded Packet Capture
In the last article, Learning TrustSec, An Introduction to Inline Tagging, we took a quick look at manual configuration of SGT Inline Tagging in a manual configuration. We also performed some validation with show commands and proved the operation by enabling enforcement.
In today’s article, we will perform slightly deeper validation of the inline imposition itself. For this process, we will use Netflow and Embedded Packet Capture. I happen to know that there is already EIGRP traversing the link that will help produce some output. Let’s just jump right in with a very basic Netflow configuration.
Netflow Configuration
//you could additionally configure and exporter //if there is a proper netflow collector flow record my_record_output match flow cts source group-tag match flow cts destination group-tag match ipv4 source address match ipv4 destination address match ipv4 protocol match transport source-port match transport destination-port flow monitor my_monitor_output record my_record_output ! interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1 description trunk to c9kSW2 switchport mode trunk ip flow monitor my_monitor_output output cts manual policy static sgt 100 trusted
Verification Using Netflow
c9kSW1#show flow monitor my_monitor_output cache
Cache type: Normal (Platform cache)
Cache size: 10000
Current entries: 1
Flows added: 9
Flows aged: 8
- Active timeout ( 1800 secs) 2
- Continue reading
Validating SGT Inline with Netflow and Embedded Packet Capture
In the last article, Learning TrustSec, An Introduction to Inline Tagging, we took a quick look at manual configuration of SGT Inline Tagging in a manual configuration. We also performed some validation with show commands and proved the operation by enabling enforcement.
In today’s article, we will perform slightly deeper validation of the inline imposition itself. For this process, we will use Netflow and Embedded Packet Capture. I happen to know that there is already EIGRP traversing the link that will help produce some output. Let’s just jump right in with a very basic Netflow configuration.
Netflow Configuration
//you could additionally configure and exporter //if there is a proper netflow collector flow record my_record_output match flow cts source group-tag match flow cts destination group-tag match ipv4 source address match ipv4 destination address match ipv4 protocol match transport source-port match transport destination-port flow monitor my_monitor_output record my_record_output ! interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1 description trunk to c9kSW2 switchport mode trunk ip flow monitor my_monitor_output output cts manual policy static sgt 100 trusted
Verification Using Netflow
c9kSW1#show flow monitor my_monitor_output cache
Cache type: Normal (Platform cache)
Cache size: 10000
Current entries: 1
Flows added: 9
Flows aged: 8
- Active timeout ( 1800 secs) 2
- Continue reading
Validating SGT Inline with Netflow and Embedded Packet Capture
In the last article, Learning TrustSec, An Introduction to Inline Tagging, we took a quick look at manual configuration of SGT Inline Tagging in a manual configuration. We also performed some validation with show commands and proved the operation by enabling enforcement.
In today’s article, we will perform slightly deeper validation of the inline imposition itself. For this process, we will use Netflow and Embedded Packet Capture. I happen to know that there is already EIGRP traversing the link that will help produce some output. Let’s just jump right in with a very basic Netflow configuration.
Netflow Configuration
//you could additionally configure and exporter //if there is a proper netflow collector flow record my_record_output match flow cts source group-tag match flow cts destination group-tag match ipv4 source address match ipv4 destination address match ipv4 protocol match transport source-port match transport destination-port flow monitor my_monitor_output record my_record_output ! interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1 description trunk to c9kSW2 switchport mode trunk ip flow monitor my_monitor_output output cts manual policy static sgt 100 trusted
Verification Using Netflow
c9kSW1#show flow monitor my_monitor_output cache
Cache type: Normal (Platform cache)
Cache size: 10000
Current entries: 1
Flows added: 9
Flows aged: 8
- Active timeout ( 1800 secs) 2
- Continue reading
Masergy Picks Bitglass Cloud Security Tech for Managed CASB Service
The managed security service provider tested Netskope’s and McAfee Skyhigh’s technology before choosing Bitglass.