Interop ITX research reveals how companies plan to bolster their networks.
Network address translation: Sometimes you need more than a simple domain name.
The post Tier 1 carrier performance report: October, 2017 appeared first on Noction.
Everyone knows that Service Providers and Enterprise networks diverged decades ago. More precisely, organizations that offer network connectivity as their core business usually (but not always) behave differently from organizations that use networking to support their core business.
Obviously, there are grey areas: from people claiming to be service providers who can’t get their act together, to departments (or whole organizations) who run enterprise networks that look a lot like traditional service provider networks because they’re effectively an internal service provider.
Read more ...The November 2017 issue of the IETF Journal is now online at https://www.ietfjournal.org/journal-issues/november-2017/. With IETF 100 in Singapore starting this coming weekend, this is the perfect time to get caught up on what’s been happening in the world of Internet standards lately. (Starting next week, you can also learn more about the Internet Society’s work at IETF 100 via our series of Rough Guide blog posts.)
In this issue, you’ll learn about implementation work taking place in the Human Rights Protocol Considerations Research Group, the latest security updates to Network Time Protocol, new email-related Working Groups JMAP and EXTRA, as well as the important coding work that took place as part of the IETF Hackathon.
Our regular columns from the IETF, IAB, and IRTF chairs and coverage of the Birds-of-a-Feather meetings and presentations from the Applied Networking Research Prize winners wrap up the issue.
There will be print copies available at IETF in Singapore, the email version will hit subscribers’ inboxes in the coming days, and print subscribers will receive their issues shortly thereafter.
This issue marks the final hardcopy version of the IETF Journal. As we explain in “We’re Continue reading
Courtesy of @mahtin
As some of you may know, there's a wall of lava lamps in the lobby of our San Francisco office that we use for cryptography. In this post, we’re going to explore how that works in technical detail. This post assumes a technical background. For a higher-level discussion that requires no technical background, see Randomness 101: LavaRand in Production.
As we’ve discussed in the past, cryptography relies on the ability to generate random numbers that are both unpredictable and kept secret from any adversary. In this post, we’re going to go into fairly deep technical detail, so there is some background that we’ll need to ensure that everybody is on the same page.
In cryptography, the term random means unpredictable. That is, a process for generating random bits is secure if an attacker is unable to predict the next bit with greater than 50% accuracy (in other words, no better than random chance).
We can obtain randomness that is unpredictable using one of two approaches. The first produces true randomness, while the second produces pseudorandomness.
True randomness is any information learned through the Continue reading
Courtesy of @mahtin
As some of you may know, there's a wall of lava lamps in the lobby of our San Francisco office that we use for cryptography. In this post, we’re going to explore how that works. This post assumes no technical background. For a more in-depth look at the technical details, see LavaRand in Production: The Nitty-Gritty Technical Details.
As we’ve discussed in the past, cryptography relies on the ability to generate random numbers that are both unpredictable and kept secret from any adversary.
But “random” is a pretty tricky term; it’s used in many different fields to mean slightly different things. And like all of those fields, its use in cryptography is very precise. In some fields, a process is random simply if it has the right statistical properties. For example, the digits of pi are said to be random because all sequences of numbers appear with equal frequency (“15” appears as frequently as “38”, “426” appears as frequently as “297”, etc). But for cryptography, this isn’t enough - random numbers must be unpredictable.
To understand what unpredictable means, it helps to consider that all Continue reading
It’s time for the third and final IETF meeting of 2017. Starting on Sunday, 12 November, the Internet Engineering Task Force will be in Singapore for IETF 100, where about 1000 engineers will discuss the latest issues in open internet standards and protocols. All this week, we’re providing our usual Internet Society Rough Guide to the IETF via a series of blog posts on topics of mutual interest:
All these posts can be found on our blog and will be archived through our Rough Guide to IETF 100 overview page.
Here are some of the activities that the Internet Society is involved in and some of my personal highlights.
Catch up on highlights from IETF 99 in Prague by reading the IETF Journal. You can read all the articles online at https://www.ietfjournal.org, or pick up a hardcopy in Singapore.
This issue marks the final hardcopy version; starting in 2018, we’ll be shifting our focus to longer-form articles online and via our Twitter and Facebook channels. In the meantime, this issue has articles on the Human Rights Continue reading
In a recent blog post we discussed epoll behavior causing uneven load among NGINX worker processes. We suggested a work around - the REUSEPORT socket option. It changes the queuing from "combined queue model" aka Waitrose (formally: M/M/s), to a dedicated accept queue per worker aka "the Tesco superstore model" (formally: M/M/1). With this setup the load is spread more evenly, but in certain conditions the latency distribution might suffer.
After reading that piece, a colleague of mine, John, said: "Hey Marek, don't forget that REUSEPORT has an additional advantage: it can improve packet locality! Packets can avoid being passed around CPUs!"
John had a point. Let's dig into this step by step.
In this blog post we'll explain the REUSEPORT socket option, how it can help with packet locality and its performance implications. We'll show three advanced SystemTap scripts which we used to help us understand and measure the packet locality.
The standard BSD socket API model is rather simple. In order to receive new TCP connections a program calls bind() and then listen() on a fresh socket. This will create a single accept queue. Programs can share the file descriptor - pointing Continue reading
First of all, we’re thrilled to announce that today we launched OpenStack with Cumulus in the Cloud. That means that you can now test out Cumulus Networks technology with an OpenStack environment easily and at zero cost to you.
I’ve written previously about Cumulus In The Cloud (CitC) when we first released it a month ago with Mesos as the initial release flavor. Since then, JR Rivers and his team have been diligently working on adding additional flavors to the CitC offering. I could not have been happier to hear the good news that they had integrated an OpenStack solution with the cloud testing framework.
I immediately launched my own free instance of Cumulus in the Cloud using the standard steps. I was greeted with a new option where I could pick the flavor of CitC I wanted to initiate:
Since I had already experimented with Mesos, I was eager to tinker with OpenStack to better learn this technology.
To be upfront, I am not an OpenStack expert. I have been diligently learning it over the past six months ever since a majority of my customer engagements have involved private cloud deployments leading with OpenStack. As a network engineer first, Continue reading
![]() |
Continue reading |
There are several situations where we need to write some form of policy such as QoS, routing policies used in for example redistribution, filtering and policy-based routing, dot1x and so on. Lately I had to update a policy used by the master controller (MC) in an IWAN design. What are some important things to consider when writing the policy?
The number to start with – If you start with the number one then it won’t be possible to insert anything above this line at a later time. How certain are you that you will never have to put anything before the starting line? My recommendation is to start with a higher number such as 100.
Space between each line – Don’t number your lines 100, 101, 102, 103 and so on. Leave some more space between each line in case you have to insert something later between two lines. A spacing of 10 should be fine for most situations.
Go from most granular to least granular – The policy should go from as granular as possible to the least granular at the end. If you have a statement that is too broad you may catch more than you expected even Continue reading