

Before identity-driven Zero Trust rules, some SaaS applications on the public Internet relied on the IP address of a connecting user as a security model. Users would connect from known office locations, with fixed IP address ranges, and the SaaS application would check their address in addition to their login credentials.
Many systems still offer that second factor method. Customers of Cloudflare One can use a dedicated egress IP for this purpose as part of their journey to a Zero Trust model. Unlike other solutions, customers using this option do not need to deploy any infrastructure of their own. However, not all traffic needs to use those dedicated egress IPs.
Today, we are announcing policies that give administrators control over when Cloudflare uses their dedicated egress IPs. Specifically, administrators can use a rule builder in the Cloudflare dashboard to determine which egress IP is used and when, based on attributes like identity, application, IP address, and geolocation. This capability is available to any enterprise-contracted customer that adds on dedicated egress IPs to their Zero Trust subscription.
In today’s hybrid work environment, organizations aspire for more consistent security and IT experiences to manage their employees’ traffic Continue reading
Matthias Luft concluded his part of Introduction to Cloud Computing webinar with a case study: how can you migrate an existing workload into a cloud environment?
Matthias Luft concluded his part of Introduction to Cloud Computing webinar with a case study: how can you migrate an existing workload into a cloud environment?
While I am not the most active user on Reddit, I still enjoy the community for the most part, even as a passive reader. Last week, Curiousguy1993 asked the IT Career Community some questions. As much as I wanted to jump in and type away my response, I eventually decided to structure my thoughts better […]
The post Lost and Hating Your Job in Tech? 9 Key Steps Before Jumping Ship appeared first on Packet Pushers.
https://codingpackets.com/blog/aws-subnet-plan-example
https://codingpackets.com/blog/aws-subnet-plan-example
In today's Kubernetes Unpacked episode, host Michael Levan and guest Michael Chenetz examine the complexity that comes with Kubernetes and its broader ecosystem, what engineers should expect when diving into it, and why organizations should invest in people not just tech.
The post Kubernetes Unpacked 018: Grappling With Kubernetes Complexity appeared first on Packet Pushers.
Comment: Here is a part of the introduction section of the eight chapter of my Azure Networking Fundamentals book. I will also publish other chapters' introduction sections soon so you can see if the book is for you. The book is available at Leanpub and Amazon (links on the right pane).
This chapter introduces an Azure VNet Peering solution. VNet peering creates bidirectional IP connections between peered VNets. VNet peering links can be established within and across Azure regions and between VNets under the different Azure subscriptions or tenants. The unencrypted data path over peer links stays within Azure's private infrastructure. Consider a software-level solution (or use VGW) if your security policy requires data path encryption. There is no bandwidth limitation in VNet Peering like in VGW, where BW is based on SKU. From the VM perspective, VNet peering gives seamless network performance (bandwidth, latency, delay, and jitter) for Inter-VNet and Intra-VNet traffic. Unlike the VGW solution, VNet peering is a non-transitive solution, the routing information learned from one VNet peer is not advertised to another VNet peer. However, we can permit peered VNets (Spokes) to use local VGW (Hub) and route Spoke-to-Spoke data by using a subnet-specific route table Continue reading


In November 2022, our bug bounty program received a critical and very interesting report. The report stated that certain types of DNS records could be used to bypass some of our network policies and connect to ports on the loopback address (e.g. 127.0.0.1) of our servers. This post will explain how we dealt with the report, how we fixed the bug, and the outcome of our internal investigation to see if the vulnerability had been previously exploited.
RFC 4291 defines ways to embed an IPv4 address into IPv6 addresses. One of the methods defined in the RFC is to use IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses, that have the following format:
| 80 bits | 16 | 32 bits |
+--------------------------------------+--------------------------+
|0000..............................0000|FFFF| IPv4 address |
+--------------------------------------+----+---------------------+
In IPv6 notation, the corresponding mapping for 127.0.0.1 is ::ffff:127.0.0.1 (RFC 4038)
The researcher was able to use DNS entries based on mapped addresses to bypass some of our controls and access ports on the loopback address or non-routable IPs.
This vulnerability was reported on November 27 to our bug bounty program. Our Security Incident Response Team (SIRT) was contacted, and incident response activities Continue reading
The simplest way to implement layer-3 forwarding in a network fabric is to offload it to an external device1, be it a WAN edge router, a firewall, a load balancer, or any other network appliance.

Routing at the (outer) edge of the fabric