Pertino is now syncing its WAN & SDN expertise with Cradlepoint’s LTE networking.
In addition to faster throughput, the MX Series gets some boosts from automation.
HSRP, VRRP and GLBP are the three commonly used first hop redundancy protocols in local area networks and the data center.
In this post, I will briefly describe them and highlight the major differences. I will ask you a design question so we will discuss in the comment section below.
source: Orhan Ergun CCDE Study Guide – Workbook
HSRP and GLBP are the Cisco specific protocols but VRRP is an IETF standard. So if the business requirement states that more than one vendor will be used , then VRRP is the best choice to avoid any vendor interoperability issue.
For the default gateway functionality HSRP and VRRP uses one virtual IP corresponds one Virtual Mac address.
GLBP operates in a different way. Clients still use one virtual IP address but more than one virtual mac address is used. So each default gateway switch has its own virtual Mac address but same virtual IP address.
To illustrate this, lets look at the below picture.
source: Orhan Ergun CCDE Study Guide – Workbook
In the above picture, clients use same gateway mac address since the first hop redundancy protocol is HSRP.
If GLBP was in used, on the PC we would see different gateway Continue reading
Yesterday I described the theoretical limitations of using OpenFlow for load balancing purposes. Today let’s focus on the practical part and answer another question:
@colin_dixon @ioshints and for a fair comparison: Would a $100k OF switch be able to act as proper LB?
— Kristian Larsson (@plajjan) December 3, 2015
I wrote about the same topic years ago here and here. I know it’s hard to dig through old blog posts, so I collected them in a book.
Read more ...Dyn prides itself on being fast, but how do we measure ourselves? How do we compare to everyone else? With all the vagaries of DNS measurement due to caching effects, congestion, and routing irregularity, is it even possible to devise a useful, believable metric, one that anyone could validate for themselves? Dyn Research decided to tackle this challenge and this blog explains our approach. We encourage our readers to suggest improvement and try this methodology out for themselves.
Over the years Dyn has built a high-performing authoritative DNS network using strategic placement of sites and carefully engineered anycast to provide low-latency performance to recursive name servers all over the world. We use our Internet performance monitoring network of over 200 global “vantage points” to monitor DNS performance and our comprehensive view of Internet routing from over 700 BGP peering sessions to make necessary routing adjustments. This synthetic DNS monitoring and routing analysis are important tools to understand performance. But since the ultimate goal is delivering a good user experience, it’s important to measure performance from the user’s perspective. (We have written about the importance of user-centric DNS performance testing in the past.)
User perception of DNS performance depends on Continue reading
DT competes 'more fiercely' with Google and Amazon.