What is ASBR? Autonomous System Boundary Router. This seems easy, it is just used in OSPF, isn’t it?. In fact, that is wrong. You will learn in this post something, that is hopefully you will learn the first time. Let’s have a look at it.
ASBR is a node, that is connecting two or more networks. It can be a router or switch and it can be positioned at the Internet Edge. The router at the Internet Edge is referred to as IGW (Internet Gateway) Router and it can be an IGW Router.
It can be located between two different networks to provide MPLS service for example. Between two networks, service is referred to as Inter-AS MPLS VPNs and in RFC 2547, Section 10, 3 different Inter-AS MPLS VPN Options are explained. In all of them, the routers that are connecting two different Autonomous System is referred to as ASBR as well.
On those routers, usually, BGP runs in Inter-AS MPLS VPN service. OSPF is not mandatory.
Thus, saying it is used in OSPF would be a false claim. It can be used for many different services in the networks and ASBR can run any routing protocol, not just Continue reading
What Layer is MPLS?. This basic question needs to be clarified for the Network Engineers.
MPLS – Multi-Protocol Label Switching first was invented for fast packet processing. As MPLS Label is 20 bits, and IP address is 32 bits, processing MPLS Label was considered faster back in old times.
Today, as of 2022 MPLS is used for many different purposes, one of the most common reasons to have MPLS in the Networks is VPN.
MPLS VPNs, MPLS Layer 2 VPN, and MPLS Layer 3 VPN are two of the most common VPN mechanisms in large Enterprise and Service Provider Networks.
The label is used for two reasons in MPLS VPNs.
A tunnel label or transport label is used for the reachability between the edge devices, PE devices in MPLS networks.
And another label, which is the VPN label is used to differentiate the customers in MPLS VPN.
Both of these labels are placed between MAC Header and IP Header in IP Packets.
Thus, as you can see from the below picture as well, MPLS is commonly referred to as Layer 2.5.
Figure – MPLS is Layer 2.5
As you can see, from the above Continue reading
Found a pointer to another you cannot beat the laws of physics or networking result: you cannot avoid latency spikes with end-to-end congestion control regardless of the amount of unicorn dust or hype you’re throwing at the problem (original paper).
An array is a sequence of values, of the same type. A tuple is defined with square brackets []. Array Considerations Arrays live on the stack by default and have a fixed size. Traits are only implemented on an array with a size of 32 or less. Arrays with a size greater than 32 lose...continue reading
A tuple is a sequence of values, which can be of different types. A tuple is defined with circle brackets (). Tuple Considerations The number of elements in a tuple is known as its arity. Traits are only implemented on a tuple with an arity of 12 or less. Tuples with an arity...continue reading
A char in Rust represents a single unicode scalar value. A char is defined as a single character within single quotes eg: ('a'). Char Considerations A char is not the same as a single str character. Strings DO NOT use chars internally. A char is always 4-bytes in length. continue reading
The if conditional block in Rust behaves similarly to other languages. In Rust, if blocks act as an expression and the resulting branch can be assigned to a variable. The resulting expression of an if branch can be assigned to a variable with the let keyword. If...continue reading
We’re in Austin, Texas this week where the 84th North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) convention is taking place. Preceding that, during the Super Bowl ⅬⅤⅠ weekend (in which another blue team is about to win big), there is a Hackathon in which the teams are challenged to prepare for the networking equivalent of an epic halftime show.
Yours truly figures it would be a good idea to use this opportunity to kick-off the creation of a multi-vendor NAPALM driver. Most (if not all) NAPALM drivers to date are single vendor, see for example the Nokia SR OS NAPALM driver and the SR Linux variant. However, there is significant overlap in functionality and logic, and so I’d like to see if there is a possibility to “share the burden” by collaborating on some of the more basic (and — quite frankly — boring) parts of the drivers.
My (rough) plan is to clone the best current NAPALM driver code base — eos has been suggested — remove whatever logic it uses to talk to its vendor specific device APIs, and replace that with pyGNMI. To demonstrate this Continue reading
Have to work with VMware SD-WAN (the entity formerly known as VeloCloud)? You might find interesting tidbits in Crazy about VMware SD-WAN by Alexander Marhold.
I saw an interesting thread today on Reddit talking about using networking equipment past the End of Life. It’s a fun read that talks about why someone would want to do something like this and how you might find yourself in some trouble depending on your company policies and such. But I wanted to touch on something that I think we skip over when we get here. What does the life of the equipment really mean?
As someone that uses equipment of all kinds, the lifetime of that equipment means something different for me than it does for vendors. When I think of how long something lasts I think of it in terms of how long I can use it until it is unable to be repaired any further. A great example of this is a car. All of my life I have driven older used cars that I continue to fix over and over until they have a very high mileage or my needs change and I must buy something different.
My vehicles don’t have a warranty or any kind of support, necessarily. If I need something fixed I either fix it myself or Continue reading
Today's Heavy Networking makes the case for why network engineers should consider using the Go language instead for their automation needs. Guest Darren Parkinson makes a strong argument for adding Go to your tool kit.
The post Heavy Networking 617: Go Vs. Python For Network Engineers appeared first on Packet Pushers.
After a brief excursion into the ancient data link layer addressing ideas (that you can still find in numerous systems today) and LAN addressing it’s time to focus on network-layer addressing, starting with “can we design protocols without network-layer addresses” (unfortunately, YES) and “should a network-layer address be tied to a node or to an interface” (as always, it depends).
For more details, watch the Network Layer Addressing video (part of How Networks Really Work webinar).
We are excited to share that Vectrix has been acquired by Cloudflare!
Vectrix helps IT and security teams detect security issues across their SaaS applications. We look at both data and users in SaaS apps to alert teams to issues ranging from unauthorized user access and file exposure to misconfigurations and shadow IT.
We built Vectrix to solve a problem that terrified us as security engineers ourselves: how do we know if the SaaS apps we use have the right controls in place? Is our company data protected? SaaS tools make it easy to work with data and collaborate across organizations of any size, but that also makes them vulnerable.
The past two years have accelerated SaaS adoption much faster than any of us could have imagined and without much input on how to secure this new business stack.
Google Workspace for collaboration. Microsoft Teams for communication. Workday for HR. Salesforce for customer relationship management. The list goes on.
With this new reliance on SaaS, IT and security teams are faced with a new set of problems like files and folders being made public on the Internet, external users joining private chat channels, or an Continue reading
Earlier today, Cloudflare announced that we have acquired Vectrix, a cloud-access security broker (CASB) company focused on solving the problem of control and visibility in the SaaS applications and public cloud providers that your team uses.
We are excited to welcome the Vectrix team and their technology to the Cloudflare Zero Trust product group. We don’t believe a CASB should be a point solution. Instead, the features of a CASB should be one component of a comprehensive Zero Trust deployment. Each piece of technology, CASB included, should work better together than they would as a standalone product.
We know that this migration is a journey for most customers. That’s true for our own team at Cloudflare, too. We’ve built our own Zero Trust platform to solve problems for customers at any stage of that journey.
Several years ago, we protected the internal resources that Cloudflare employees needed by creating a private network with hardware appliances. We deployed applications in a data center and made them available to this network. Users inside the San Francisco office connected to a secure Wi-Fi network that placed them on the network.
For everyone else, we punched a Continue reading