Migration to VMware NSX-T Data Center (NSX-T) is top of mind for customers who are on NSX for vSphere (NSX-V). Broadly speaking, there are two main methods to migrate from NSX for vSphere to NSX-T Data Center: In Parallel Migration and In Place Migration. This blog post is a high-level overview of the above two approaches to migration.
Customers could take one of two approaches for migration.
In this method, NSX-T infrastructure is deployed in parallel along with the existing NSX-V based infrastructure. While some components of NSX-V and NSX-T, such as management, could coexist, compute clusters running the workloads would be running on its own hardware. This could be net new hardware or reclaimed unused hardware from NSX-V.
Migration of the workload in this approach could take couple of different approaches.
There is simpler method though! A method that doesn’t require dedicated hardware. It’s an in place migration approach. Curious? This method uses Continue reading
Continue reading "ShortestPathFirst Now Has a New, Shorter Domain Name – spfirst.net"
In today’s uber-connected world, everyone has dealt with that little voice in the back of the...
It also reached an agreement for Cloudflare to deploy its cloud services on Vapor IO’s Kinetic...
Previously, I’ve written a number of articles that compared syntax between Cisco and MikroTik and have received some great feedback on them.
As such, I decided to begin a series on Juniper to MikroTik starting with MPLS and L3VPN interop as it related to a project I was working on last year.
In the world of network engineering, learning a new syntax for a NOS can be overwhelming if you need a specific set of config in a short timeframe. The command structure for RouterOS can be a bit challenging if you are used to Juniper CLI commands.
If you’ve worked with Juniper gear and are comfortable with how to deploy that vendor, it is helpful to draw comparisons between the commands, especially if you are trying to build a network with a MikroTik and Juniper router.
The lab consists of (3) Juniper P routers and (2) MikroTik PE routers. Although we did not get into L3VPN in this particular lab, the layout is the same.
A note on route-targets
It seems that the format of the route-target has some bearing on this being successful. Normally i’ll use a format like Continue reading
Happy Days have returned! I have been invited to attend Network Field Day #22 (#NFD22) in San Jose, CA on …
The post Network Field Day 22 appeared first on Fryguy's Blog.
A little while ago I explained why you can’t use more than 4K VXLAN segments on a ToR switch (at least with most ASICs out there). Does that mean that you’re limited to a total of 4K virtual ethernet segments?
Of course not.
You could implement overlay virtual networks in software (on hypervisors or container hosts), although even there the enterprise products rarely give you more than a few thousand logical switches (to use NSX terminology)… but that’s a product, not technology limitation. Large public cloud providers use the same (or similar) technology to run gazillions of tenant segments.
Read more ...The software giant says Nyansa's technology will enable improved network visibility, monitoring,...
Cisco advanced intent-based networking; SK boasted standalone 5G first; and Citrix swatted ADC,...
Antoine Sirois of Kontron sat down to share his thoughts on mobile edge, CDN, and the future of...
Today's Full Stack Journey episode explores Contour, an an Envoy-based Kubernetes Ingress controller. My guest is Steve Sloka. In addition to Contour, we also talk about Steve's journey into Docker, containers, and Kubernetes as a developer, and their impact on his career.
The post Full Stack Journey 038: Exploring Kubernetes And The Contour Project With Steve Sloka appeared first on Packet Pushers.
The open source security startup reported over 400% revenue growth in 2019 and says its customers...
The five-year contract will span more than 20 production sites in 11 countries across four...