The Trap of Net Neutrality
The President recently released a video and statement urging the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to support net neutrality and ensure that there will be no “pay for play” access to websites or punishment for sites that compete against a provider’s interests. I wholeheartedly support the idea of net neutrality. However, I do like to stand on my Devil’s Advocate soapbox every once in a while. Today, I want to show you why a truly neutral Internet may not be in our best interests.
Lawful Neutral
If the FCC mandates a law that the Internet must remain neutral, it will mean that all traffic must be treated equally. That’s good, right? It means that a provider can’t slow my Netflix stream or make their own webmail service load faster than Google or Yahoo. It also means that the provider can’t legally prioritize packets either.
Think about that for a moment. We, as network and voice engineers, have spent many an hour configuring our networks to be as unfair as possible. Low-latency queues for voice traffic. Weighted fair queues for video and critical applications. Scavenger traffic classes and VLANs for file sharers and other undesirable bulk noise. These plans take weeks to Continue reading