The Cloud is Not a Railroad – An Argument Against the Vertical Separation of Cloud Providers

There's a move to regulate cloud providers by vertically separating the services they offer.
Like railroads of yore, who were not allowed to provide freight services on top of their base services, cloud providers would not be allowed to provide services on top of their base platform services.
Vertical separation would be new to the cloud industry. Is it a good idea? Would it actually solve any problems? My answers are no and no, but probably not for the reasons you think. Let's dive in.
Here are a few useful resources for exploring this argument:
- Maintaining monopolies with the cloud by Cory Doctorow. https://pluralistic.net/2022/09/28/other-peoples-computers.
- A group advocating for fair licensing. https://www.fairsoftwarelicensing.com/our-principles.
- Cloud Infrastructure Services -- An analysis of potentially anti-competitive practices by Professor Frédéric Jenny. https://www.fairsoftwarestudy.com/.
Now Cory is about 100x times smarter than I am, but this analogy is wrong:
That's why the trustbusters were so big on "structural separation": the principle that a business can own a platform or use the platform, but not both.
So this remedy is also wrong:
Rather than trying to construct rules that kept the referee honest even when they played on one of the teams, they Continue reading


