Designers should be trained to understand the real problems. An excellent solution to the wrong problem is worse than no solution. As a designer, you shouldn’t start by trying to solve the problem given to you. You shouldn’t try to find a best design for the given problem.You should try to understand the real issues.… Read More »
The post Understanding the real problems for Network Design appeared first on Network Design and Architecture.
“Judge me by my size, do you?”
I’ve had several discussions with people over the years about the concept of scale in the world of network engineering. Most often, when network engineers think of a “large scale network,” they used to mention large service providers. Now they tend to think of some large cloud provider. But is scale really about size? I’m not much into the backflipping Yoda of the later Star Wars movies, but I would argue scale is much more about backflips than it is about being big.
So what is scale about? In the networking world, scale can be given the shorthand services x size. Standing in a huge data center with rows and rows of racks and blinking lights, it’s easy to forget about the services part of that equation.
A useful way to understand this is consider the services offered by a pair of networks, one large, and one small. The typical cloud provider’s network might contain thousands of nodes in a single data center — something more than 1000x10g (or 10,000x1g) ports on the edge is moderately sized in this world. What services does such a network — within the network itself — Continue reading
There are days when IPv6 proponents have to feel like Chicken Little. Ever since the final allocation of the last /8s to the RIRs over four years ago, we’ve been saying that the switch to IPv6 needs to happen soon before we run out of IPv4 addresses to allocate to end users.
As of yesterday, ARIN (@TeamARIN) has 0.07 /8s left to allocate to end users. What does that mean? Realistically, according to this ARIN page that means there are 3 /21s left in the pool. There are around 450 /24s. The availability of those addresses is even in doubt, as there are quite a few requests in the pipeline. I’m sure ARIN is now more worried that they have recieved a request that they can’t fulfill and it’s already in their queue.
The sky has indeed fallen for IPv4 addresses. I’m not going to sit here and wax alarmist. My stance on IPv6 and the need to transition is well known. What I find very interesting is that the transition is not only well underway, but it may have found the driver needed to see it through to the end.
I’ve Continue reading
Define "Blast Radius"
The post Network Dictionary: Blast Radius appeared first on EtherealMind.
Quality of service (QoS) is the overall performance of a telephony or computer network, particularly the performance seen by the users of the network. Above is the Quality of Service definition from the Wikipedia. Performance metrics can be bandwidth, delay, jitter, pocket loss and so on. Two Quality Of Service approaches have been defined by… Read More »
The post Do you really need Quality of Service ? appeared first on Network Design and Architecture.
The first half of 2015 was extremely productive – seven brand new webinars (or 22 hours of new content) were added to the ipSpace.net webinar library.
Most of the development focus was on SDN and network automation: OpenFlow, NETCONF and YANG, Ansible, Jinja and YAML, and Monitoring SDN networks. There was also the traditional Data Center Fabrics Update session in May, IPv6 Microsegmentation webinar in March, and (finally!) vSphere 6 Networking Deep Dive in April.
Do I have to mention that you get all of them (and dozens of other webinars) with the ipSpace.net subscription?
Read more ...The post Worth Reading: More Leaky Routes appeared first on 'net work.
There has been a plethora of docker-related info on the internet this week, thanks in no small part to DockerCon, and I was motivated to finish this blog post about container networking.
In short, it seems like most if not all container networking projects are going out of their way to give devs the feeling of a “flat” network. My question is - who cares?
Seems to me that "cloud-native" applications should be okay if two of the cattle are not on the same broadcast domain.
— Matt Oswalt (@Mierdin) June 24, 2015For this post, I am not talking about IaaS (which is arguably a declining use case). I am talking about an application cloud provider (i.e. SaaS, and maybe PaaS) where all IP addresses are assigned by the provider and under their control, within the context of the data center.
The way that most of these projects are being marketed to developers is that they provide one big flat network upon which to communicate. Why this choice of terminology? Why does “cloud-native” application design not by default include things like IPv6, or application nodes that are agnostic of what broadcast domain they are participating in?
I have Continue reading
There has been a plethora of docker-related info on the internet this week, thanks in no small part to DockerCon, and I was motivated to finish this blog post about container networking.
In short, it seems like most if not all container networking projects are going out of their way to give devs the feeling of a “flat” network. My question is - who cares?
Seems to me that "cloud-native" applications should be okay if two of the cattle are not on the same broadcast domain.
— Matt Oswalt (@Mierdin) June 24, 2015For this post, I am not talking about IaaS (which is arguably a declining use case). I am talking about an application cloud provider (i.e. SaaS, and maybe PaaS) where all IP addresses are assigned by the provider and under their control, within the context of the data center.
The way that most of these projects are being marketed to developers is that they provide one big flat network upon which to communicate. Why this choice of terminology? Why does “cloud-native” application design not by default include things like IPv6, or application nodes that are agnostic of what broadcast domain they are participating in?
I have Continue reading
In the networking world, we’re starting to see the term “cloud” more and more. When I teach classes, if I so much as mention the word cloud, I start to see some eyes roll. That’s completely understandable, as the term cloud was such an overused buzzword, only having been recently supplanted only by “software defined”.
Here’s real-life supervillain (dude owns an MiG 29 and an island with a volcano on it… seriously) Larry Ellison freaking out about the term cloud.
“It’s not water vapor! All it is, is a computer attached to a network!”
But here’s the thing, it’s actually a thing now. Rather than a catch-all buzzword, it’s being used more and more to define a particular type of operational model. And it’s defined by NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, part of the US Department of Commerce. With the term cloud, we now get a higher degree of specificity.
The NIST definition of cloud is as follows:
That first item on the list, the on-demand self service, is a huge change in how we will be doing networking. Right now network Continue reading
This is a liveblog for the DockerCon 2015 session titled “Scaling New Services: From Container Creation to Automated Deployments”. This session is being led by the Disney Systems Engineering team and will feature a discussion/demo involving Docker, Mesos, Chef, Consul, and HAProxy.
The session starts with an introduction by Alex Williams, founder of The New Stack, who quickly turns it over to the Disney staff—Brian Scott and Patrick O’Connor. Brian starts with an overview of all the various companies within Disney, and the challenges that breadth creates. He then discusses the role of Disney’s Systems Engineering team, and the responsibilities of the team. That includes managing infrastructure, both on-premises as well as cloud-based infrastructure.
So, why Docker? To improve the guest experience, Disney needs to be able to move fast. They want to get away from managing VMs and cattle to managing containers and micro-bots. Brian talks about issues with onboarding developers, battling configuration drifts, and similar challenges. Disney started on their Docker journey 6-10 months ago, and lots of teams are still exploring the use cases for Docker. Some teams are already using it in the CI pipeline, and other teams are evaluating production use cases. CI is a Continue reading
This network design uses global/regional MPLS backbone as primary WAN connectivity method, with Cisco DMVPN backup. DMVPN spokes should have a regional primary hub with secondary hubs also based on location.
The post Designing A Multi-Region, Multi-Hub Phase 3 DMVPN With BGP appeared first on Packet Pushers Podcast and was written by Matt Love.
