BGP Route Reflector vs Confederation
BGP Route Reflector – RR vs Confederation is one of the first things Network Engineers would like to understand when they learn both of these Internal BGP scalability mechanisms. For those who don’t know the basics of these mechanisms, please read BGP Route Reflector in Plain English and BGP Confederation Blog posts from the website first.
BGP Route Reflector vs BGP Confederation
There are many differences when we compare Confederation vs Route Reflector and in this post, some of the items in the comparison chart will be explained.

BGP Route Reflector vs Confederation Scalability
Both of these techniques are used in Internal BGP for scalability purposes. But BGP RR changes the Full Mesh IBGP topologies to the Hub and Spoke. BGP confederation divides the Autonomous System into the sub-ASes but inside every Sub-AS, IBGP rules are applied.
Inside BGP Sub Autonomous System, full Mesh IBGP or Route Reflector is used. So, we consider BGP RR compare to Confederation to be more scalable because inside Sub-AS still full-mesh IBGP might be used.
If RR inside Sub-AS is deployed, then configuration complexity would increase.
BGP Route Reflector vs Confederation Loop Prevention
BGP Route Reflector in order to prevent the routing loop Continue reading



An explanation of my Network Anyverse Strategy. Normal practice for data networking was that technology was narrow: fixed bandwidth, focus on selected technology, and there were only service I look at the progression of Networking in the new future that I sometimes call the Four A’s: Anyhow Anywhere Anytime Anyway Anywhere Distributed work means that […]